|
i seriously think the only reason people hold onto the notion that chrono cross was good, only do so because of how much they liked chrono trigger.
because, lets face it, CC was really nothing more than an average rpg. maybe its because i play so many damn console rpgs, but it takes a lot for a game to stand out and be on a level above the others (dragon warrior 4, ff6, CT, xenogears, etc). but chrono cross really didnt have anything going for it. way too many characters, a plot that literally has nothing to do with chrono trigger except what, a few references to lucca?
i dunno. i really think the game only got a lot of hype because of the name attached to it. i feel the same way about final fantasy games. only one or two of them have actually been good, and the rest are just average. people just tend to put a lot more compliments into something which had a big name.
but about chrono break, id like to see where you have evidence that its going to be a game... as far as i knew, there was a reference of "chrono break"... which could be a game, could be a movie or anime series (tho tehres already a chrono trigger anime of sorts out), etc.
so yea. to summarize: chrono trigger was good, chrono cross was weak, and falls under the "average" category that in my opinion, 95% of console rpgs fall under nowadays.
|