what is it with trancers and James Holden? I'm at a loss to why his productions are viewed as trance, and yet most progressive house gets passed as 'boring'?
___________________
Do you think Paul Van Dyk really believes in Angels? I hope so, he’ll need their help to answer for all that bad music he’s made. - Sean Cusick
Nov-21-2002 14:28
robstar
Excited
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Stockholm
Dunno(?)
Personaly I don't consider Holder Progressive House!
He's just progressive too me!
Originally posted by Bedrock
what is it with trancers and James Holden? I'm at a loss to why his productions are viewed as trance, and yet most progressive house gets passed as 'boring'?
i agree...
Nov-21-2002 14:58
escee
q1dm6
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Perth, Australia
i think its because some trancers feel dirty if they listen to progressive.
Nov-21-2002 15:04
Bedrock
Tranceaddict Terrorist
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Perth
Re: yeah
quote:
Originally posted by Elixir
hell yeah!!!!!
but really, can you compare eg. 'one for you' and other prog stuff and still label it as PROGRESSIVE HOUSE?????
i don't...
greets
saying One For You is not prog house is laughable!
___________________
Do you think Paul Van Dyk really believes in Angels? I hope so, he’ll need their help to answer for all that bad music he’s made. - Sean Cusick
Nov-21-2002 15:05
basd
progression
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere nowhere
Re: Re: yeah
quote:
Originally posted by Bedrock
saying One For You is not prog house is laughable!
*yawn*
Putting every track in its own small labeled box is laughable.
Why do people want to classify every track they hear? More important, why do people argue about bs like this? Just enjoy it..
*/yawn*