 |
|
|
|
 |
24K
[CD-R!!!1!]

Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Gangcouver, B.C.
|
|
|
Dec-07-2002 11:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
Rememberence_
James Packer

Registered: Oct 2002
Location: HXTA #6
|
|
|
| quote: | | But monitors shouldn't really be reccommended by someone else. Everyone has a different taste. The best thing you can do is go to a shop and do a comparison between several monitors. |
I disagree for the mostpart. I want a pair of speakers that will reproduce the audio that I put through them as accurately as possible, considering my budget. I don't see how this has anything to do with taste. At this stage I am finding out what is available - their prices, specs etc... when I finally choose what to buy, I may go and hear them, but I'm sure my ears will enjoy them because they will be good quality by choice of specs. Hence this thread, I'm looking for feedback on what choice other people have made, why, and how satisfied they were in the end. In other words, what is popular.
Thanks for the info tamtui, I looked at those yesterday and they are some that I am seriously considering!
___________________
"I played 12.30 til close at 3am at the club (Antro), following on from an Australian dj,
which seemed unusual in deepest Texas." - Judge Jules
|
|
Dec-07-2002 19:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJDavidScott
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location: New York , NY
|
|
|
Oh man! The TRUTHs are amazing! I just scopped up a pair to complete my sound system. I have them connected to my other baby: RANE MP & XP 2016! These monitor produce such a crytal clear sound. I almost have to train my ear to hear elements of the music I was missing wiht other speakers. These are the best for the money and maybe, just maybe can give the Alesis MKs a run for their money at over a grand!
Happy shopping...well recommended.
___________________
I just do it exactly the way I enjoy listening to it. This is most of the time it is with banging beats. It is even with a soft thing, a soft melodic idea, or whatever. I still like to have it rocking. Keep in mind what this music is made for, first of all. Its not made to be easy listening on the radio. Its not made to be easy listening in television. Its actually kick ass in the club. This is what music is. This is the purpose of this art form...to listen to it and let the frequencies actually blow you away. --Paul Van Dyk
|
|
Dec-09-2002 16:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
Dj Thy
Deckhead

Registered: May 2001
Location: Belgium, Earth
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Rememberence_
I disagree for the mostpart. I want a pair of speakers that will reproduce the audio that I put through them as accurately as possible, considering my budget. I don't see how this has anything to do with taste. At this stage I am finding out what is available - their prices, specs etc... when I finally choose what to buy, I may go and hear them, but I'm sure my ears will enjoy them because they will be good quality by choice of specs. Hence this thread, I'm looking for feedback on what choice other people have made, why, and how satisfied they were in the end. In other words, what is popular.
Thanks for the info tamtui, I looked at those yesterday and they are some that I am seriously considering! |
Agreed when you go for studio monitors, you aim to get speakers that can sound as linear as possible. But taste does matter for some bit, and also everyone has a different hearing.
Just to give an example. Mackie HR824 are regarded by many engineers as THE best nearfield monitors available up to now (I think so too). Ultra linear, very precise and all that. Yet other engineers don't like em at all. Too muddy, they say. They prefer Genelecs over them (and then again many people say Genelecs sound to harsh and are tyring to listen in the long run). Both systems are examples of exemplary linearity, yet there are divided opinions on them.
That, and the fact that you NEED a completely linear system is not always true. If you from yourself that when mixing tunes (mixing as in production mixdown, that's what nearfield monitors are made for after all) you are a little bass heavy, there's nothing wrong with monitors that have an emphasis in the bottom end (you'll automatically put less bass in your tunes, which may sound better on other systems later). As long as it works for YOU.
I like the Behringers, I bought them myself. I like the sound they produce, and feel they're good enough for what I do with them now (I might go Mackie when I want to move on). Yet I know a lot of people that find the Truths the biggest pile of sh*t ever made (after a blind test, without them knowing which brand it was, I know a lot of people say Behringer is crap just because of the name).
Take my advice on it. Go to the shop and take a cd you know by heart. You know how it should sound, and from there on compare monitors. You may find that you prefer other monitors over the Behringers (like the Alesis, I'd say they are on par with the Truths).
|
|
Dec-09-2002 18:47
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:55.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|