but i see a lot of the ppl in the TA community use soundforge...
so i was just wondering which one is better... and for what is it better at?
thx..
Dec-05-2002 09:11
Pjotr G
Mindcrawler
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Netherlands
I don't think it really matters much, it's just what you're used to. I'm btw grown into 1 being with Cooledit 2000
___________________
All rhythm evolves around a kick...
Dec-05-2002 10:46
robstar
Excited
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Stockholm
Soundforge looks really boring, that's one of the reasons why I don't use it.
I use Cool Edit pro 2.0! It's very easy to work with and u can choose between lot of Skins.
Dec-05-2002 10:55
arctic
Teh Pwn
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Australia
i use soundforge, although cool edit looks good as well.
___________________
Currently Whoring:
Space Tribe Vs Electric Universe - Rabbit Hole
CPU - So It Begins
Too Short & Mistah FAB - The Sideshow
Dec-05-2002 15:07
danceaddict
Tiesto In Concert \o/ \o/
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Netherlands
Most of the time I use Cooledit becoz I have worked with it for so many years, and I like the interface of it. And yeah Soundforge does have a boring interface
___________________
Dec-05-2002 16:26
Spacer
tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: london, uk
both
The use of both i would say that is the best anyone can do, each one has parts that the other has not..so ...
Dec-05-2002 18:06
SAGE2635
Suspended User
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: UWSAstudioCambridge
Its all about Steinberg Wavelab!!!
Dec-05-2002 18:38
locutox
tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
The best thing about Cool Edit Pro 2.0 is its new Spectrum Analyzer. I record a lot of tunes from my Commodore 64 and HardSID and nothing looks cooler then pulse-width modulation and vibrato techniques It also looks a lot sharper compared with older versions.
My signature was made by heavily magnifying a said tune from a sid chip with some added Photoshop sparkle.
___________________
Dec-08-2002 00:08
charly b.
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Villa María, Córdoba
Well, both of them are great. Cool Edit has the multitrack option. Sound forge divide the waveform into regions, and it's more easy to create loops. Cool Edit now comes with the mp3PRO codec, and now you can create loops more efficiently. You decide which is best. But try Steinberg Nuendo or Sonic Foundry Vegas 3.0. You won't believe it!
Greetings.
Dec-18-2002 05:10
El~ZaPo
W32.Trance.1999@mm
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
quote:
Originally posted by robstar
Soundforge looks really boring, that's one of the reasons why I don't use it.
I use Cool Edit pro 2.0! It's very easy to work with and u can choose between lot of Skins.
I also use Cool Edit pro 2... but I didn't know there were skins! This I gotta see...
Dec-18-2002 16:16
midevlbstr
tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: san jose, usa
It just depends on what you can do with each program. remember, its the man not the machine...however, soundforge has been rated the number 1 wave editing program sooo many times by sooo many magazines--it just has so many features, btw,I use soundforge.
___________________
Because it takes time for light to travel, looking out into space means looking back in time.
Dec-18-2002 18:52
Rising
[L]iquid [J]un[K]i'e
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: pLastiC faNtaStic
Cool Edit pro 2 here aswell, sounds forge is well boring..
less friendly.
This I gotta see... 
