 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Luke Terry
tranceaddict oldskool

Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by JohnSmith
I and most TAs would disagree with you on the stanton RM3. I've heard very bad things about it, and i think the vestax PCV 275 is way better.
then again, i have never used the RM3, so my opinion doesn't mean much! |
well i've had both and i can honestly say they are both rather crap lol. the rm3 is the cheapest and is also the most resiliant, but my bass eq broke on it lol, but by 175, 2 faders broke and the faceplate paint comes streaming off if u so much blow on it. but the stanton maes far less crappy noise like the vestax's click + pop, and it doesn't have the dip in the fader, so imo its better value for money as it may give a more wet sound quality but doesn't give off a load of other crap. and i know wicked neo has lived by his until his recent purchase of a djm like me, and he never thought bad of the rm3, and i thought it was rather a nifty little mixer, although the colour is a bit off-putting.
___________________
w: www.luketerry.com
|
|
Dec-27-2002 11:16
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
dj_ray_c
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Leeds, England
|
|
|
Ive got a 275 and love it. Nice sound, Clean Crisp EQ's.
I dnt like the 'dip' but its avoidable if you know what ur doing.
I really cant see the point in spending 600 quid on a DJM when u can have one of these for half the price. At the end of your day its only your bedroom. And for commercial purposes get the Allen n Heath one!
|
|
Dec-28-2002 17:06
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|