I read it and my mind is not changed. The argument FOR believing that this war is over oil is presented fairly well in the first few paragraphs.

The arguments to the contrary are basically that the US could get access to iraqs oil by lifting the sanctions. There is two reasons they don't want to do this.

One is that the sanctions are hurting iraq badly, and they like that. The benefits of cheap iraqi oil do not outweigh giving up their strangle hold on iraqs economy. and who says iraq would sell cheap oil to the US anyway? they are enemies after all. They'd probably charge an outrageous price, or sell it through a middle man who would also inflate the price.

the US is better off getting it's oil elsewhere, and that is why the sanctions won't be lifted.

The second reason is, the US doesn't want to BUY iraqs oil, it wants to STEAL iraqs oil, as in take it over. how? i'm not sure.. but i am confident Dubya will do his best.

___________________

Visit my site Antiwar Homepage

my 6.0 SUV needs oil!

___________________
[/IMG]http://i54.tinypic.com/ngycqo.png[/IMG]

Additionally... oil, as a source of fuel, is basically headed towards extinction. Hydrogen-based fuel is the way of the future, and will probably be more prevalent than petroleum in 10-15 years.

I'm not sure what the Arab world is going to do economically once that happens, but I suspect it isn't going to be pretty. They've invested billions in their petroleum industries, and for most Arab nations the vast majority of their economic infrastructure is based on petroleum sales. Once demand plummets, these countries are probably going to need some kind of aid. I'm interested to see if the EU, which has been decidedly pro-Arab for some years now, will be willing to foot the bill.

you are generalizing, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Algeria, Morocco and some more aren't living on Petroleum. The gulf states are, and they are in deep shit cause they are also so in debt!! stupid morons!

___________________
[/IMG]http://i54.tinypic.com/ngycqo.png[/IMG]

quote:

Originally posted by ahlamalek you are generalizing, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Algeria, Morocco and some more aren't living on Petroleum. The gulf states are, and they are in deep shit cause they are also so in debt!! stupid morons!

You're right, I said "most" but there are a lot of them that aren't dependent on petroleum.

I would just love to fast forward 50 years, to see how will the middle east be. Gulf states and Israel aren't self sustainble.

___________________
[/IMG]http://i54.tinypic.com/ngycqo.png[/IMG]

quote:

Originally posted by Arbiter Additionally... oil, as a source of fuel, is basically headed towards extinction. Hydrogen-based fuel is the way of the future, and will probably be more prevalent than petroleum in 10-15 years. I'm not sure what the Arab world is going to do economically once that happens, but I suspect it isn't going to be pretty. They've invested billions in their petroleum industries, and for most Arab nations the vast majority of their economic infrastructure is based on petroleum sales. Once demand plummets, these countries are probably going to need some kind of aid. I'm interested to see if the EU, which has been decidedly pro-Arab for some years now, will be willing to foot the bill.

I think it'll be more than 10-15 years. Hell, we could ditch our gas guzzlers right now no problem. We have all the technology to do so, but people are just too greedy in nature. No way oil companies will let themselves go out of business that easily.

___________________
jimtran.net

it is a well known fact that oil reserves are rapidly declining...i even read sumwhere that within 5 yrs., we'd prolly hit the peak of oil production, and from then on it will start only to decline...of course from basic economics we can tell that we will never get to the point where there is absolutely no oil, (as in 'not-a-single-drop-left') since as the amount of available oil goes down, its price will be driven up to insanely high levels (the whole supply-demand thing)..

so in order to prevent the prices of oil from taking that route, it would make sense for the US to take over iraq's oil assets now...the country that controlled the most oil would be the most powerful...

just my $0.02

The reason US is attacking Iraq is because it doesn't want to buy oil from Iraq, it wants to gain ownership of the Iraqi oil producing plants and oil rich areas.

And about the gulf countries getting screwed up when the oil is gone, remember that Iran had a large nuclear program which would make it independent on oil, but that was before the US supported islamists took over and ended that program.
For the rest of those countries, they're just plain stupid, investing so much in luxuries and nothing in real infrastructure, they're gonna get so screwed up when the oil is gone.

___________________
1+1=10

quote:

Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0 The reason US is attacking Iraq is because it doesn't want to buy oil from Iraq, it wants to gain ownership of the Iraqi oil producing plants and oil rich areas.

the article brings up a good point to debunk that opinion:
"
Finally, an American takeover of Iraq would not, in the long run, give the United States guaranteed access to Iraqi oil. A democratic Iraq might well decide that its future prosperity would be best served by a supply relationship with, say, China, now an importer of oil with rapidly growing demand. The days when industrialized countries acquired ownership of oil in producing countries are decades in the past. Conversely, a fragmented Iraq, breaking up along ethnic lines, might produce less oil than currently, rather than more.
"

___________________
If God is the answer, it must have been a very stupid question.

quote:

Originally posted by Izzy the article brings up a good point to debunk that opinion:

ya its like these people can't read! maybe thats why they formulate such ridiciouliously naive opinions on this topic. Read the damn thing, you might learn something!