Registered: Sep 2002
Location: home or somewhere else
why are some artist albums mixed together???
does anyone have a clue, why is it? i really don't get it!
i understand dj mixed albums which consist of tracks by different artists that are mixed! but what the fuck for would you mix an artist album?
bt - rare & remixed
for example is one of these albums and paul van dyk albums are mixed too! that sucks! they are totally worthless because of this! i really hate it!
Originally posted by skip
... they are totally worthless because of this! ...
That probably the point!!!
Now you still have to buy the singles and vinyls.
Grtz
Feb-28-2003 13:08
Mr.Mystery
Static Guru
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Vantaa
I'm feeling quite the opposite - why are most albums not mixed together?
To me an album is something else than 12 radio edits chucked together. That's not an album - it's a bunch of tracks on 1 disc.
That's why I've always loved BT & Junkie XL albums... they take you on a journey and the tunes tell you a story.
The albums are not meant for DJ's. They're for the home listeners.
I feel the same way as Mr. Mystery. I am at a point where if it not mixed, I dont like listening to it. for the most part, if you were to buy the vinyl counterpart to those albums, the vinyl is still unmixed and in Skip's terms.. not "totally worthless".
For instance, I got the global dvd to watch and to listen to his recreation and mix of his trax of the last 10 yrs, not to spin the tracks i didnt have. Plus, you could still spin them (judgeing from the PvD cuz that is the only one of the artists i have heard), just dont let the tracks go all the way to the end!
Feb-28-2003 14:09
Lira
Ancient BassAddict
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Brasilia, Brazil
quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
I'm feeling quite the opposite - why are most albums not mixed together?
To me an album is something else than 12 radio edits chucked together. That's not an album - it's a bunch of tracks on 1 disc.
That's why I've always loved BT & Junkie XL albums... they take you on a journey and the tunes tell you a story.
The albums are not meant for DJ's. They're for the home listeners.
Werd
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
Feb-28-2003 15:10
Mel David
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Sydney
I like it when there are two versions available for sale. A mixed version and a separate tracks version.
Feb-28-2003 16:41
barryfigiel
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Right behind you!
quote:
Originally posted by Mel David
I like it when there are two versions available for sale. A mixed version and a separate tracks version.
Yeh I agree...
I think it should be like this, so then you have the choice. From this, they can take the sales figure and look at which sells better. At least then they would know what the public want rather than giving us something which is just ok.
lateRZ,
barryfigiel
___________________
Feb-28-2003 21:28
skip
a.k.a. skip2
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: home or somewhere else
quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
I'm feeling quite the opposite - why are most albums not mixed together?
To me an album is something else than 12 radio edits chucked together. That's not an album - it's a bunch of tracks on 1 disc.
That's why I've always loved BT & Junkie XL albums... they take you on a journey and the tunes tell you a story.
The albums are not meant for DJ's. They're for the home listeners.
have you listened to bt's rare & remixed? that album is mixed like shit, the tracks are kind of mixed, but then again not! there are breaks between the tracks and it's just totally weird imo!
if i'm listening to an album that isn't mixed together, my journey won't be interrupted by breaks between tracks, not at all. but for each their own i guess!
Originally posted by skip
have you listened to bt's rare & remixed? that album is mixed like shit, the tracks are kind of mixed, but then again not! there are breaks between the tracks and it's just totally weird imo!
if i'm listening to an album that isn't mixed together, my journey won't be interrupted by breaks between tracks, not at all. but for each their own i guess!
it sounds fine too me =\
___________________
"The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes"
Mar-01-2003 00:20
Nell
sure thing
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Newcastle , England
in my memory by tiesto was good, 10 tracks (roughly) to their entirity and unmixed and also a bonus disc of all the remixes.
if cds should be mixed albuims then so should vinyl, so you buy the singles. its such a load of shti having them mixed, thats for mix comps.
Aand what happens if you want to listen to ONE track and not the whole cd?! you then have to listen to a mixed intro and outro to a track, which is gay. some tracks you are meant to hear the intro and outro to the fullest.
the only exception to this are chicane albums! some fo the ambient tracks are belended together and the rest not, which is fine imo.
___________________
Mar-01-2003 00:23
GrimReaper
Relic of a past life
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Espoo, Finland
To me it's kinda like yes and no. Some albums i like more when mixed and then again some not. Like Oliver Lieb's LSG albums are great when mixed, but of a few BT albums, i'd like to have unmixed versions.
___________________
The walking discography.
quote:
Leslie Nielsen:
Doing nothing is very hard to do... you never know when you're finished.
Mar-01-2003 00:31
torontotrance
I hath returned
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto
You are not the artist, so if the artist wants to release an album that has a part of it is mixed and people will buy it then the artist has every right. If you don't like it then go buy the 3X12" unmixed album or buy the maxicd's. If you don't like it then don't buy it and find something else to spend yer money on.