Early stones was really good

its funny because the 2 groups come from 2 different backgrounds, the stones came from a well off background and a lot of them are very educated, wheras the beatles had a kinda rougher upbringing and had no real qualifications......its weird in hindsight that the stones music had a more rougher edge to it.....but the beatles sound was more polished


alot of the beatles early stuff was good as well, ie help there music was based on harmonys.....but i Prefer the stones

___________________
ID 1ID 2ID 3

stones

___________________
PODCAST:http://www.djatomx.podomatic.com

FACEBOOK:http://www.facebook.com/djatomx

SOUNDCLOUD: http://www.soundcloud.com/djatomx

rolling stones suck pretty much IMO



but beatles on the other hand is a great band (altho they've made loads of crap too)

___________________

Get Dropbox, with 250 MB extra space!

Start me up

Gotta respect the Stones for being together for as long as they have. The Beatles were only together for like 6-7 years or so, which might be long by todays standards but still it was over pretty quick.

beatles all the way, i hate the stones

___________________

insignificant cor member alliance

quote:

Originally posted by mentalbarter Stones > Beatles

___________________
Tokyo Taxi ( Tokyo Mix ) Hope for 07.

My Dad is a massive Beatles fan, and my Mum just loves the Stones. So I have to stay completely neutral under danger of death.

___________________

"I expect to pass through life but once. If therefore, there be any kindness I can show, or any good thing I can do to any fellow being, let me do it now, and not defer or neglect it, as I shall not pass this way again."

STONESS...

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN dont argue with the yanks nutter, they know best!

I voted Beetles. :)

The Rollings!!