|
Depends on what the context is. If it's a dramatized death for something already wrong like the Iraq war, then sure, that's bad.
But if it's a single case for something worthwhile, especially if it concerns the lives of more people, a dramatization that would open people's eyes with its effect, then who is to say that the loss of one life counters the loss of many more?
Here's a hypothetical example: prior to the recent Liberian fiasco, no one really cared about what was (and is) happening in Africa, which is much worse than Iraq IMO. Let's say that there was a big news story dramatizing the severe crippling of a young African boy due to a multi-warlord battle that ended up frying his village. And let's say this caused international attention to spike and with it, the hope for improvement. Would that dramatization be exploiting the tragedy of others?
|