 |
|
|
|
 |
sandstorm03
...
Registered: Feb 2003
Location:
|
|
|
Thoes are some tunes....Id have to say Dreamland 2003 is a 10/10 for me, it fuckin roX...
___________________
Time exists so everything doesn't happen at once. Space exists so everything doesn't happen to you
|
|
Sep-18-2003 22:13
|
|
|
 |
 |
sandstorm03
...
Registered: Feb 2003
Location:
|
|
|
from what i def know it is officially Dreamland(2003 live edit)...if u can find their energy set..they played it there...it is an improvement on their original which is AMAZING!!!!!!!
___________________
Time exists so everything doesn't happen at once. Space exists so everything doesn't happen to you
|
|
Sep-18-2003 22:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
sandstorm03
...
Registered: Feb 2003
Location:
|
|
|
I understand what u mean...but it isnt totally a new song...its just an improvement of the Orig which i would give just about a 10...you gotta hear it...live especially...
___________________
Time exists so everything doesn't happen at once. Space exists so everything doesn't happen to you
|
|
Sep-18-2003 22:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
TranceSafari
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location: Indianapolis Indiana, USA
|
|
|
I'm glad someone brougt this up.
The real problem is the scale. A ten point scale isn't precise enough if everyone is going to give 10's all the time. It needs to be done on a hundred point scale, or use decimals like 9.5 or 8.7. I have no problem with people giving 10's all the time. I respect that as that person's opinion.
Here's the real thing though. In my personal opinion, if I rate 3 different songs all 10's, do I like them all equally? Probably not. I would like atleast one of those songs more than the other two. So let's say that makes one of them 9.5, one 9.7, and one 9.9.
The other problem is that there is no universal scale. For one person a 6/10 might be a bad song, but for the next person it could be considered better than average or the medium of the scale which might be a 5/10.
I think we need a universal TA Rating Scale. Something that might look like this:
0 - Doesn't exsist (If someone took the time to make the song
it deserves to be rated atleast a 1)
1 - Physically hurts your ears to listen to
2 - Doesn't Physically hurt, but you feel dumber after hearing it
3 - A definate Waste of Time
4 - Tolerable, but it needs a remix
5 - Average
6 - Getts better after several listens
7 - Worth Buying
8 - Great song, but after a few hundred plays you'll be sick of it.
9 - Absolutely Amazing Record! I'll never get sick of it.
10 - One of the best records ever made (in my opinion of course)
You could then use decimals to vary your ratings, because everybody can usually distinguish between which of their 10's are there absolute favorites.
And one more thing. There is no such thing as an 11/10 or a 15/10 or what ever. If the record is that good, then you rated a whole bunch of other 10's too high.
Anybody else have ideas for a Universal TA Rating Scale, or the UTARS for short?
|
|
Sep-19-2003 00:56
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:25.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|