Consider suing RIAA or Labels!
So, here I am - driving in my car listening to my favorite CD and then SKK-SKK-SKK-SKK-SKK-SKK-SKK-SKK<<>>>SKIIIIIPPPP goes my CD.
DAMN! My favorite CD! Scratched! WTF!!!
I eject and look for scratches on the "shiny" side - no sign of scratches... just 2 or 3 little "bumps" - turns out the CD was not scratched, the actual foil was scratched! how the hell did that happen?
Apparently, sand or some grime got into my CD pouch and scratched the top side (label side) of the CD. CD now is trash. NO SKIP doctor will help you... No CD player with 16 laser beams all hitting from different angles will help you now.
WHY????!!! you cry.. because YOUR CD'S ARE MADE CHEAP NOW!
So, let me get this straight... CD can cost you as much as $20 and now can be scratched not just from the obvoius, shiny side but from the top side???
Yup... just try it with a CD you don't like... Take a pen and just slightly scratch the surface of your CD on the top side, where the label is - most likely your CD will be unusable thereafter.
Here's why:
Originally, CD's were made like a sandwich - you had your plastic coat on top and bottom with foil (that holds the "peaks and valleys" - that make up your CD) sandwiched between. It appears that now, all CD's (or most) skip the top layer of plastic...
Why? because it is cheaper this way... So, while your CD's have gone up in price almost 100%, the cost went down substantially to produce the CD. Which brings me to my point.
I feel that if I spend $20 on a CD that can get scratched that much easier now, I should be able to take it to the store I bought it from and exchange it for the same one ANYTIME it happens. Sort of like "lifetime" guarantee. Most of the CDRs you buy have that warranty, I don't see a reason why I couldn't.
The store I took my CD to would not even consider swapping it for the same one. Reason - YOU DON'T HAVE A RECEIPT!
Why the hell should I hold on to a receipt after I open the CD? Well, now it apears you should and even if you did have it you wouldn't be able to exchange it if after x number of days.
I believe this is unfair to consumer (me and you) and I also believe that this was done INTENTIONALLY to INCREASE the likelyhood of CD becomming damaged, so that you'd buy another one (or entice piracy?) If RIAA wants you to believe that you are "RENTING" the music, you don't "OWN" it, then, since I paid for the "RENT" - I should get my rental property fixed otherwise refund my RENT fees! Right?
With that said, I think there's a basis here for a class-action law suit against RIAA and Record Labels. If I get enough interest in this idea, I will present it to my friend who has a law firm and see if we can launch a class-action law suit against RIAA, similar to "lemon law" or other consumer protection suits that are aimed to protect you, the consumer.
Chime in with your opinion - am I nuts or is there some sense in this.
Yours in fight,
/me
___________________
Proud member of the "Filthy Zionist" coalition
|