for the theory to hold true... the area of the little boxes must remain the same... when u slice a box... u ensure that u join that box with a box of equal area... :d
Nov-12-2003 07:45
Aled Mann
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: North Wales
Yeah! What he said!
___________________
NEW Releases
Aled Mann :: Cause & Effect (Inc. Gate 42 Remix) (Discover Records)
Previous Releases
Aled Mann :: Cold Fusion (Inc. John Askew & Sean Tyas Remix) [Discover] - Out Now
Activa Ft. Aled Mann :: In Essence (Inc. Matt Hardwick Vs Smith & Pledger Remix) [Somatic Sense] - Out Now
Stenna :: Skyline (Inc. Arizona Remix) [Flux Delux] - Out Now
Aled Mann :: Flashback (Inc. George Hales Remix) [Bonzai Music] - Out Now
John O'Callaghan & Bryan Kearney :: Restricted Motion (Aled Mann Remix) [Discover] - Out Now
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Wisconsin, USA CTA #23
I'm going with Vic on this one.
Nov-12-2003 22:37
allstar
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Québeccity,Québec,Canada
quote:
Originally posted by victor
for the theory to hold true... the area of the little boxes must remain the same... when u slice a box... u ensure that u join that box with a box of equal area... :d
Yea.. small variations in areas might not be noticeable in a single square but when slicing through many, the difference will add up - and equal exactly one extra square.
Nov-12-2003 22:53
kypez
.:LikWit Addict:.
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary, CANADA
wow thats way to intense
Nov-13-2003 00:08
Stéphanie
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Laval
Nov-13-2003 21:46
Stanza
Natural Born Trancer
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Sydney
Maybe a translation will help us...
Nov-13-2003 21:51
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
makes you think real hard.
but vic, your right.
___________________
Nov-14-2003 02:08
victor
P A R T YY? coz we gotta!
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Montréal
lol... it's actually from graph theory...
if u consider one of the small boxes as a square with 4 nodes then... when u break a segment... u delete a node... but when u add that node back... on a plain piece of paper i can add it anywhere as the length of my segment is not defined!!!
in that case i can prove...
8x8 = 1!!! if i just superimpose the nodes on one another...
thats why the length of the segments must remain the same... or in simpler terms... the area of each box must remain the same...
im doing graph theory at shcool right now thats why i know... this was easy coz we all know that 8x8 is not 65....
but to prove 8x8 = 64 the same way is simply retarded.. LOL
Nov-14-2003 04:36
Sadmafioso
p€uRf $qu@Ð
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: La Maizeron *LavaL-Qc*
It is really easy to understand...Just look closer to what happens to the squares
