you'll find the 600 in a more clubs then an x-9 by a long shot. at least here in the u.s. that said however, the x-9 is a better mixer, at least in my opinion. both are solid mixers and you can't go wrong owning either of these machines. i'd say go with your pocket book on this one and save the extra cash for some vinyl. i know you're looking for a bigger review but i've got to run. sorry. cheers.

___________________
www.takamine-entertainment.com

DENON X-1500 will be better than both these...due out in the U.S. in January...

I'm holding off till this mixer comes out to make my decision on my mixer upgrade...
Either the new Denon or the Allen & Heath 62...

___________________
SINsation Sound

well, if I go with my pocket book I'd get the X-9. it would save me about $50, but when your spending near $1000, $50 dosen't matter. I just want the better mixer.

sorry for the topic hijack but if you're spending a grand, get a xone62 mate, it's the nectar of the gods.. in the form of a mixer

___________________
"I played 12.30 til close at 3am at the club (Antro), following on from an Australian dj,
which seemed unusual in deepest Texas." - Judge Jules

if i were you i'd put all decisions about choice of mixer on hold until this xone - 92 comes out.

The X9 is a nice mixer - have one here, but the nobs are sooooo teeeny tiny to use that when your a bit smashed its a bitch to use - pluse there are some oddities on it that just make it weird to use. I actually prefer using my djm-300 because of the size and ease of use of all the nobs and buttons.

___________________
www.11eight.co.uk