|
Last nights DJ nightmare and question about DJM-500/600
Last night I played at a well performed party here at my university where a band played. The only problem was that I had no monitors and the buliding wasn't made for clubbing. The party was held in the main buliding of the university, which is almost entirely of glass, and that created a LOTS of echoes which fecked up my mixing.
I also encountered a DJM-500 for the first time - which didn't worry me a whole lot since I've played on a DJM-300 before (I'm used to Numark and the headphone monitoring on those mixers are a bit different from the Pioneer ones - so I feel a bit more comfortable with the Numark mixers). But when I tested the 500 mixer, mixing in my headphones just to get familiar the mixer while they were setting up the sound system (I got there really early), I got freaked out - when I had the master qued up in my headphones the level was AWFULLY low, compared to the other channels - and it didn't make a lot of difference when I turned the master fader up either, so I don't really know if this is how the DJM-500 and 600's work, or if this mixer just had been tortured a lot, but I think it sucked big time.
On the Numark mixers you have a fader knob on which you can fade from the master to the qued channels for your headphone monitoring, and I really miss that on the Pioneer mixers. I don't know if it's just me, but it makes the beatmatching a lot easier. I guess I just have to practice on some other mixers as well. Besides all this, nothing even compares to the Pioneer mixers (at least not out of those mixers that I've played on).
And I have absolutely no idea of why I made this thread.
Cheers
___________________
Facebook
www.djlaszlo.com
blog.laszlo.se
www.laszlo.se
|