|
| quote: | Article 16.
(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. |
Just according to the above, that wouldnt hold in a court of law for the simple reason that is interpretable as follows:
It does not explicitly say without any limitation to sexual orientation. Thus, this article can be interpreted as NOT giving positive rights of marriage to people on grounds of sexual orientation, and used to discriminate against them.
I mention that it COULD be interpreted in that fasion, rather than being interpreted as all men and women of full age, and with a good lawyer, the article wouldnt hold up.
Note that I am NOT against gay marriages...simply pointing out that referring to article 16 of the UN charter won't take you very far in convincing people who are opposed to it.
|