|
Some deep thought from myself.
Existence. Let us suppose that this physical state of existence is only the beginning of the soul's (or astral body or whatever you want to call it depending on religion  ) journey into perpetuous existence. In this scenario, one could deduce that when our physical bodies expire our astral bodies become infused with etheric matter and we travel inside another existence or state of consciousness (for more information on etheric matter and the astral body visit www.outofbody.co.uk ) then, what if at the end of that portal, we are merely 'born' into another existence? For all we know, what’s at the end of that light could merely be a buffer zone between assignments. Supposedly, this universe is infinite, which would in turn make it a multiverse (because what is the universe expanding into, and for all we know there are forces available in this universe that we do not have the technology to detect), which would in turn create infinite parallel realities. From what we know, everything that exists exists in perfect equilibrium; otherwise it would be impossible to be maintained as stable (a constant variable if you will). Scientifically, free will is an illusion because we have no control over who our parents are nor our environment, therefore, we are being governed by forces we cannot perceive.
Religion. Supposedly, we were created in God's image according to Christianity. That poses the question "What is God?" Well, God is all things that exist if he is our creator, and if God is all things that exist, then God is merely energy, because that in essence is all we really are. We are no more than a heaping sum of chemical processes up to this point, which in a nonconformist way, supports the argument that we were created in God's image, also, God is supposedly perfect, which in terms of beauty in math and space and time and it all to hang in balance, this also supports.
Time. The universe is both infinitely large and small. Subatomic particles make up larger things, therefore to those infinitely smaller objects, time would affect them differently. To us, those incredibly tiny particles would have to be traveling and processing whatever chemical sums needed for motion or whatever else to occur it would be happening at an incredible rate of speed, and this speed would exponentially increase with the amount of tininess that the matter bears. Because one of the constants in this universe is physics, all particles are treated equally, therefore, if something is infinitely smaller, time would pass slower for the basic elements of the most basic elements we can measure, therefore there is much much more to be learned about the universe regarding physics.
Theory. A while ago (if my information is correct) you may have heard of an experiment where atoms would be smashed at the speed of light and either of two things were supposedly possible: a black hole would be created, or existence would be created. I heard that the result was the expansion of the particle, exactly like the big bang, just in a jar so to speak. At the precise moment of impact, would antimatter have to be created to offset the sheer immensity of the impact? Does antimatter govern how black holes or existence is processed? If black holes exist, it would be limitless energy perpetuously feeding on itself. ( A vacuum in a vacuum if you will ) So, my guess is that the byproduct of creating either existence 'by smashing atoms' or black holes would have to be antimatter or else neither would be possible. For all we know, black holes could just be another form of existence acting as a port to relieve pressure between realities thus creating divine equilibrium.
Utopia. I believe that if we (as a world, the whole world) elected officials that would create a conformist society that embraces creativity a utopia would be possible
Time travel. Supposing time travel is possible, lets say you traveled back in time. For this to be possible, you would have to travel faster than the speed of light because theoretically that’s as fast as motion can exist according to Einstein. Now, if you could do this, you would be opening a rift in the multiverse (see www.johntitor.com for some interesting theory even if it is a possibility that it is a hoax ) and an entirely different existence would have to be formed to allow such an intrusion of all things that be. Upon arrival to that time, you would know no one and you would have to learn all that has happened up to that point because it must now at that very point conform to your intrusion, but what about traveling forward in time? If you traveled forward in time, your vessel would have to conform to that period and would be aged infinitely instantly.
___________________
Ah' Silence, the mortifier of unallocated disruption. *yawn *turns on winamp.
|
