Originally posted by icyhandofcrap
no, i didnt watch it, but the transcript is on drudge
heh.. they got nowhere, but at least they did it in an interesting fashion.
From the little I've seen of O'Reilly, I've come to the conclusion that it simply isn't possible for anyone who disagrees with him to on anything to get anywhere at all, period. He's a proven liar, he's abusive, and he's consistently irrational.
Jul-28-2004 10:54
NeoPhono
Übermensch
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: In Orbit
quote:
Originally posted by arctic
He's a proven liar, he's abusive, and he's consistently irrational.
Are you talking about O'Reilly or Moore here?
Jul-28-2004 10:55
arctic
Teh Pwn
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Australia
quote:
Originally posted by NeoPhono
Are you talking about O'Reilly or Moore here?
Well, from the little I've seen of O'Reilly I'd say that he's worse than Moore. I agree that Moore too engages in some dubious comment (and this is coming from someone further to the left than he is), and I don't always agree with him. I did enjoy Roger & Me, and the Big One was a good film as well. I also thought that Bowling For Columbine was a fantastic film in some respects, I agreed with Moore in general -- but I did get irritated at his selective editing and some of the antics that he employed.
I often find myself in general agreement with Moore's central case/overall point, but i don't always like the way he presents it. To sum up, I both agree and disagree with him now and then. So yeah, I suppose what I said could be applied to both of them, but to different extents.
Jul-28-2004 11:03
speedracer_mec
DeepHouse & Progressive
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Greece, where the good progressive comes from.
quote:
Originally posted by arctic
Well, from the little I've seen of O'Reilly I'd say that he's worse than Moore. I agree that Moore too engages in some dubious comment (and this is coming from someone further to the left than he is), and I don't always agree with him. I did enjoy Roger & Me, and the Big One was a good film as well. I also thought that Bowling For Columbine was a fantastic film in some respects, I agreed with Moore in general -- but I did get irritated at his selective editing and some of the antics that he employed.
I often find myself in general agreement with Moore's central case/overall point, but i don't always like the way he presents it. To sum up, I both agree and disagree with him now and then. So yeah, I suppose what I said could be applied to both of them, but to different extents.
