|
Who is lamer? Microsoft or Apple?
I have no issue with Microsoft. In a capitalist marketplace you should be allowed to charge whatever you want for a product if alternatives exist (i.e. Apple and Linux)
However, they obviously can spend $100 in development costs on their OS compared to every dollar Apple spends right?
Now imagine you've never seen Apple OS running or Windows Xp, and I showed you both... we surfed the web, watched a dvd, did some e-mail, played a game etc. There would be no way for you to know which one was made by the mega billion dollar company. Isn't that unbelievable?
So at the end of the presentation if you had to choose one over the other, then you'd choose the XP. Ya know why? Cause its mouse is better. The Right mouse button and the scroll wheel make XP easier to use.
My questions then are these...
1) Why can't Microsoft make a product that actually shows evidence of its difference in resources compared to apple?
2) Why can't apple be designed with the assumption that every user has a 2 button mouse with a scroll wheel. If I was Apple i'd make their next OS only work if you have a 2 button mouse installed. Staying with a one button design implies the people using their product are some sort of retards whose brains can't handle that level of complexity is embarrasing.
___________________
Светопресавление
your pearl casting hero
|