no

actually, yes, you could record the action (editing) of one photo and then automate the process for the rest of the images

___________________

Goldfrapp - A & E (Gui Boratto Remix)

wouldn't he have to go through each picture separately? i record actions and then run the actions to one file. he has multiple files.

What do you mean by "quality"?

If you want to open a number of images, possibly resize them in process, and then save, say, as a lower quality JPEG, then it's very possible. It's called batch processing. Photoshop certainly can do that, but it would be even simpler to use a free image viewer called IrfanView. Fire it up and go to File > Batch Conversion/Rename or just press the B key. There you can resize, flip, rotate, apply basic filters, and, of course, save as a different type of file with specifying any quality you want.

In Photoshop it's File > Automate > Batch.

Use the photo gallery option

___________________
"We did not choose to become robots. There was an accident in our studio. We were working on our sampler, and at exactly 9:09 a.m. on September 9, 1999, it exploded. When we regained consciousness, we discovered that we had become robots."

record a macro..

quote:

Originally posted by xtr3m What do you mean by "quality"? If you want to open a number of images, possibly resize them in process, and then save, say, as a lower quality JPEG, then it's very possible. It's called batch processing. Photoshop certainly can do that, but it would be even simpler to use a free image viewer called IrfanView. Fire it up and go to File > Batch Conversion/Rename or just press the B key. There you can resize, flip, rotate, apply basic filters, and, of course, save as a different type of file with specifying any quality you want. In Photoshop it's File > Automate > Batch.

thanks everyone! especially xtr3m going to check out that picture. maybe i was pretty bad in my explanation. thanks!

___________________
:::::::::::::::::::::::::: vswede ::::::::::::::::::::::::::