|
Ever heard of a term called a "negative externality"?
It's basically a term that describes an instance where ones actions have a negative impact on an unrelated 3rd party. In other words, the US is imposing a negative externality on the rest of the world.. For such an instance to be corrected the externality has to be internalised, for balance and harmony to occur. In other words, the negative externality has to be abolished (either by removing it, or compensating those affected) Since compensation is infeasible, there's really only one other option.. And that is to get rid of Bush, or "net world welfare" will be below its optimal level.
Sorry, but I'm studying for an economics exam... it's the way my mind is programmed to think at the moment. So i'm sorry for my geekish babbling..
In English though.. No, we did not vote Bush in... We were hoping that US citizens were going to take the rest of the worlds views into account..
Seeing that your country gladly proclaims to be the leader of the world, perhaps it's time to start behaving like one..
anyway, let the flaming begin.. 
|