yep, great tut, pro53 still rules!

___________________
muz.logler.com - edm production tutorials repository
Logler.com - Download Best Games for Free

Indeed. Pro-53 is one of the only VST Instruments that I still use (along with Atmosphere and the occasional V-Station/z3ta)

Its ability to do 32 voices of unison can make some INCREDIBLY thick monophonic leads.

___________________
Youtube || Soundcloud || Synth Patch Banks

Pro 53's Unison aint that good most of the time it creats wierd sound...especially on pads ... like POWERFULL-regular-POWERFULLregular-POWERFULL-regular
this is the build up of the notes while using pro 53's unison... :/

___________________
P i l l o w - O n e AYE!

quote:

Originally posted by Perry Pro 53's Unison aint that good most of the time it creats wierd sound...especially on pads ... like POWERFULL-regular-POWERFULLregular-POWERFULL-regular this is the build up of the notes while using pro 53's unison... :/

I've never noticed that....

Why would you want to use the unison on a pad anyway? When you turn unison on, you can only play one note at a time (monophonic) and every pad I've ever seen/done had layered notes.

This is why it's good for leads since they are very often monophonic.

___________________
Youtube || Soundcloud || Synth Patch Banks

A little game for you all...

One sample is made from JP-8080
Another one is made from using Pro-53 in FLStudio 4

Guess which one is which?

A
B


It's almost the same.. but you can still tell a tiny bit of difference between the real thing and the imitation

iiiisss.. A the faker?

i have never made the pro53 saw sound in flstudio yet so i dont know. it just sounds like its less quality

Last edited by D-res on Nov-28-2004 at 21:44

pretty sure A is pro 53 and b is jp
A sounds like it has cheap fx running in the background and the way it begins and ends it sounds a bit ugly
b sounds warmer and smoother.

pm me if im right or wrong so others can keep guessing

___________________
Phunktronix Mixes

B has to be the jp. listen to the bottom end on it. as soon as the first interval played it just sounded fuller, deeper and warmer. much tighter bass end and texture of it is just...i dont know.

played A. thought, cool that sounds nice.

played B. just grinned. thats why i think its the JP.

its a shame i dont have a pro53 cuz i wouldnt mind tweaking that patch. i reckon i could get it a little more like the JP with EQs and a teeny bit of compression. they sound close enough that i reckon is do-able.

nabbed the pro-53 demo from the NI site. shame about the 10 minute deactivation but at least it doesnt have bursts of noise intermittently.

i built this supersaw to bring up the bass end. --->

Supersaw Cliche

the low end and sub reproduction on my headphones is almost non existant (sony in the ear headphones. they came with my discman). i can hear the low end fairly good though so i assume theres far too much bass if played on monitors. lemmie know if thats the case and ill fix it. if loads of peeps like it ill post the settings. on my headphones though it sounds quite warm as is. unless the person behind the JP is an unbelievable producer i reckon its fairly easy to reproduce decent supersaws just with a couple of cheap software tools.

A = Pro-53
B = JP8080

right?

___________________
-tom

yep.. anyone who said B is coorect!

BTW... i randomly switched the order of the pads again and updated it again...

so anyone else wanna take a guess??
I just wanna see how close as possible i can get my pro-53 to sound as a supersaw