 |
|
|
|
 |
RenderedDream
what should i put here?

Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Aveiro
|
|
|
Jan-18-2005 20:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
eulerfx
BELIEVE IN ME

Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Boulder, USA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by cviper
What I don't understand is which part of the exponential function "we" do not understand (no pun intended)...
It's a pretty basic function, which can be "easily" calculated numerically. It is well defined, it's pretty simple to deriver and integrate and unlike some other constants, 'e' can be approximated very good.
|
In essence, there are many things unknown about the exponential function, which mostly have to do with its holomorphic behaviour, even though its an 'entire' function. All things in math are inter-related, thus one could relate it to the Riemann hypothesis, the Gudermannian function, or quite simply to Euler's constant e, itself.
Even though e can be approximated at rapid convergence, its appearance throughout mathematics if very surprising and enigmatic. For instance, the ratio 1/e is related to the number of derrangements in an ordered set of numbers, even though combinatorics is a discrete subject.
Also look at problems in elementary calculus such as Steiner's problem, etc.
The report I would do would be related to abstract algebra and a function known as the Mobius Inversion, which is closely tied, like abstract algebra itself, to combinatorics, and the derrangements thing. The nature of this function is highly group theoretic (having to do with group theory, which seems to be a popular topic these days) and is not very difficult to grasp, unless you dwelve into the actual mathematics of it. Anyway, this function allows the computation of certain difficult combinatorial problems. For instance, it is a more general case of the Euler totient function, which basically counts the number of numbers relatively prime to a given number. In this way, the function is tied to number theory. It also counts the number of arrangements of rooks on a chess board, with forbidden propositions, etc. Read up on the Mobious inversion and study its relation to Euler's constant, and Stirling formula, etc.
There is ton's of material on this stuff, but hopefully you have access to a university library, as the information available on the internet is usally rather concise.
___________________
blog
deep blue records
Leo G - my discogs
|
|
Jan-18-2005 22:22
|
|
|
 |
 |
stevebutabi
spiritual-body-soul thing

Registered: Apr 2003
Location: On the Edge of the Trans-Amazonian Highway in a Hastily Erected Wooden Shack
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by eulerfx
In essence, there are many things unknown about the exponential function, which mostly have to do with its holomorphic behaviour, even though its an 'entire' function. All things in math are inter-related, thus one could relate it to the Riemann hypothesis, the Gudermannian function, or quite simply to Euler's constant e, itself.
Even though e can be approximated at rapid convergence, its appearance throughout mathematics if very surprising and enigmatic. For instance, the ratio 1/e is related to the number of derrangements in an ordered set of numbers, even though combinatorics is a discrete subject.
Also look at problems in elementary calculus such as Steiner's problem, etc.
The report I would do would be related to abstract algebra and a function known as the Mobius Inversion, which is closely tied, like abstract algebra itself, to combinatorics, and the derrangements thing. The nature of this function is highly group theoretic (having to do with group theory, which seems to be a popular topic these days) and is not very difficult to grasp, unless you dwelve into the actual mathematics of it. Anyway, this function allows the computation of certain difficult combinatorial problems. For instance, it is a more general case of the Euler totient function, which basically counts the number of numbers relatively prime to a given number. In this way, the function is tied to number theory. It also counts the number of arrangements of rooks on a chess board, with forbidden propositions, etc. Read up on the Mobious inversion and study its relation to Euler's constant, and Stirling formula, etc.
There is ton's of material on this stuff, but hopefully you have access to a university library, as the information available on the internet is usally rather concise. |
wow thanks for such a thoughtful answer...
the thing is though my class is physics 101... i'm not so sure if the question is asking me to go into stuff like abstract algebra
do you think you could give me a more general idea of how the world would be a better place if we more fully understood the exp function?
i mean xenocreator says the world would not in fact be a better place if we fully understood it
|
|
Jan-18-2005 23:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
zarathustra
0x40000000
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary
|
|
|
"e" has revealed itself in relation to so many phenomena, as mentionned by many in this thread, so imagine what remains to be discovered about the relation between this transcendent (pun intended) number and nature.
|
|
Jan-19-2005 01:01
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:41.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|