|
The Scott Peterson Case
Wtf, i dont get it, they dont really have any proof and still he is convicted for murder 
and why is there such a fuss about this case
edit:
hehe found loads of websites to support my case:
| quote: | On December 24, 2002 Laci Peterson disappeared from her home in Modesto, California. Less than one hour after her disappearance, her husband Scott Peterson became the major focus of the investigation. Over the next year, 300 law enforcement officers, 98 public agencies, $4 million dollars and more than 30,000 man hours were spent attempting to prove that Scott Peterson killed his wife and unborn son. At the end of the investigation, not one person could produce any evidence as to when, where, how and, most importantly, why Scott Peterson murdered his wife.
The case of the People v. Scott Peterson began on June 1, 2004. The six months of testimony included over 180 witnesses as well as a number of revolving prosecution theories designed to fit the ever changing stories of prosecution witnesses. After six months, there was still not one credible theory advanced as to when, where, how or why Scott would murder Laci. |
http://www.petersoninvestigation.com
http://www.scottisinnocent.com/
http://www.geocities.com/justicewell/scott.htm
http://www.hollywoodinvestigator.com/2004/peterson.htm
oh well, you get the point, its seriously pissing me off..
Last edited by St_Andrew on Mar-04-2005 at 03:05
|
