wtf is "Joint Stereo" and why do so many people rip to it?
Jun-21-2005 23:05
Boomer187
Spicy Hotdog
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: USA
i think the real question here is what is google?
Jun-21-2005 23:10
Fundamental
Still Alive in '25
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Scotland
quote:
Originally posted by Boomer187
i think the real question here is what is google?
I'm not sure, but I'm gonna search.
___________________
"I expect to pass through life but once. If therefore, there be any kindness I can show, or any good thing I can do to any fellow being, let me do it now, and not defer or neglect it, as I shall not pass this way again."
Jun-21-2005 23:12
meneedit
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2001
Location:
lolz, now...
wtf is "Joint Stereo" and why do so many people rip to it?
Jun-21-2005 23:17
meneedit
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2001
Location:
It sucks? thats all I needed to know
Thanks man
Jun-21-2005 23:22
capricorn15
__
Registered: May 2001
Location: CA
wrong wrong and wrong.
simply explained, Joint Stereo, if utilized correctly as it is in the LAME mp3 encoder, correctly and efficiently uses encoding bits for both left and right channels. True Stereo forces the bits as one channel, thereby wasting encoding bits and the chances of introducing artifacts or screwups in the compression are higher then that of a Joint Stereo encoding.
The myth that Joint Stereo is bad for mp3 is perpetuated by release groups in the early days of the development of MP3, when Joint Stereo wasn't as perfected and was actually worse than regular Stereo. As long as you use the LAME MP3 encoder, Joint Stereo is highly recommended and works best.
the guys at hydrogenaudio.org explain this stuff better than me but in short Joint Stereo is superior than plain Stereo.
