Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Is software catching up?
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Axolotyl
hired goon



Registered: Feb 2005
Location: atoms are not things they are possibilities
Is software catching up?

I had the pleasure of testing out discoDSP's Discovery vst the other day and must say, I was well impressed. I thought synth 1 was the be all and end all of nord lead style synths, but this thing just blew it away in my opinion. Not sure how well it would stack up in an A/B comparison with the real thing, but its a damn sight closer than any other softsynth I've tried as yet. It just has that hard ear splitting FM sound that you get from the Nord. Even has a funky gui that looks just like the NL rack3. Anyone else tried this synth yet?


Looks like software is getting phatter and phatter each day. I wonder how long it will be before the two are indistinguishable.


___________________

Old Post Jul-15-2005 01:31  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for Axolotyl Click here to Send Axolotyl a Private Message Add Axolotyl to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
BTG
Ez skinz ez lyfe



Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Milton ON

yes it is.

Old Post Jul-15-2005 02:04  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for BTG Click here to Send BTG a Private Message Visit BTG's homepage! Add BTG to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Dave West
tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2005
Location: London

Is some ways there is no catching up to do. Take the Virus and Novation K-Station for example. Both are VA synths, meaning that the sound is produced by embedded software on chip inside the machine. In both these case the manufacturers have simply ported the embedded code so that it can run as a VST/AU soft-synth and so we have the V-Station and Virus Powercore. The same would no doubt apply to all other similarly architected synths.

Old Post Jul-15-2005 08:51  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for Dave West Click here to Send Dave West a Private Message Add Dave West to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Project 7
Oakie, Oakie, Oakie!



Registered: Sep 2004
Location:

Its catching up but its got a long way to go, you can make basses that sound like hardware etc, but Leads -- no way, listen to any released track and that lead cannot and wasnt made by a soft synth

Old Post Jul-15-2005 09:55  England
Click Here to See the Profile for Project 7 Click here to Send Project 7 a Private Message Add Project 7 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
h.vox
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: May 2004
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Re: Is software catching up?

quote:
Originally posted by Axolotyl
I had the pleasure of testing out discoDSP's Discovery vst the other day and must say, I was well impressed. I thought synth 1 was the be all and end all of nord lead style synths, but this thing just blew it away in my opinion. Not sure how well it would stack up in an A/B comparison with the real thing, but its a damn sight closer than any other softsynth I've tried as yet. It just has that hard ear splitting FM sound that you get from the Nord. Even has a funky gui that looks just like the NL rack3. Anyone else tried this synth yet?


Looks like software is getting phatter and phatter each day. I wonder how long it will be before the two are indistinguishable.


well, nord lead and virus are both softsynths too, just that software is run on dsps instead on x86 family cpus. so, of course it is only a matter of time when vst instruments will sound the same. now they cannot sound the same because no one can afford to make a synth which will use up up to 40% of an athlon64 or equivalent p4. one of the best examples for this is powercore virus - it sounds just like the real thing because it uses the dsp power on the powercore card, very similar to real virus. btw i use discovery quite a lot, and yes, it kicks ass pretty much.

Old Post Jul-15-2005 13:06  Croatia
Click Here to See the Profile for h.vox Click here to Send h.vox a Private Message Visit h.vox's homepage! Add h.vox to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
*InVeRs3*
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2004
Location: E-Thuggin TA.com members

doesn't G&D use software exclusively?


edit:

I mean, software sounds totally different imo and has a unique thing to it.


___________________

Last edited by *InVeRs3* on Jul-15-2005 at 15:06

Old Post Jul-15-2005 13:55  Philippines
Click Here to See the Profile for *InVeRs3* Click here to Send *InVeRs3* a Private Message Add *InVeRs3* to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Fundamental
Still Alive in '25



Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Scotland

quote:
Originally posted by Project 7
Its catching up but its got a long way to go, you can make basses that sound like hardware etc, but Leads -- no way, listen to any released track and that lead cannot and wasnt made by a soft synth


There are plenty of released tracks which were made only with software.


___________________

"I expect to pass through life but once. If therefore, there be any kindness I can show, or any good thing I can do to any fellow being, let me do it now, and not defer or neglect it, as I shall not pass this way again."

Old Post Jul-15-2005 15:02  Scotland
Click Here to See the Profile for Fundamental Click here to Send Fundamental a Private Message Add Fundamental to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
RiCo
500+ HP Supra club member



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Somewhere

You really have to be paying attention to spot software from hardware in tracks. Anyway, I tried the Discovery versus my Nord Lead 2 and it indeed sounds close, but there is something about the Nord that in every comparo sound file I recorded, I could spot which was which. How I did it was I had a MIDI track and exported the Discovery and wrote it in the details, then did the same with the Nord Lead 2. I arranged the files in afolder like crazy and start clicking files randomly and writing in a text file my guess. I was always right. Like I said, they sound similar, but the Nord Lead 2 has something in its sound that gives it away...I cannot explain it but Nord Lead owners know what I am talking about.

Old Post Jul-15-2005 16:42  Puerto Rico
Click Here to See the Profile for RiCo Click here to Send RiCo a Private Message Add RiCo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Frase
www.frase.org.uk



Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Coventry, Warwickshire

quote:
Originally posted by Project 7
Its catching up but its got a long way to go, you can make basses that sound like hardware etc, but Leads -- no way, listen to any released track and that lead cannot and wasnt made by a soft synth


you'd be suprised

i know of one well known recent producer who has no hardware at all


___________________
frase.org.uk - music & stuff
myspace

Old Post Jul-15-2005 18:00  England
Click Here to See the Profile for Frase Click here to Send Frase a Private Message Visit Frase's homepage! Add Frase to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
-mk-
tranceaddict



Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Tampere, Finland
Re: Is software catching up?

quote:
Originally posted by Axolotyl
Even has a funky gui that looks just like the NL rack3. Anyone else tried this synth yet?


Looks like software is getting phatter and phatter each day. I wonder how long it will be before the two are indistinguishable.


Thought it looks and sounds like NL2? Anyways the sound is very similar(sampled waveforms from the original perhaps?), but the filters dont quite cut it. They come close, but not enough. And the plugin doesnt have a unison(which is very important in some keysounds ive done with NL1). The sound has differences in grittiness too, but this is more likely due to the difference between NL1 and NL2. I have NL1 so comparing it to a NL2-clone wont work so great(tho they should be pretty much the same sounding) It beats most crappy softsynths tho 100-0. And bear in mind the original awesome sounding NL1 is from 1995.. so catching up eh?


___________________
-
Matti Kotala
-mk-
www.mkdr.net

Old Post Jul-19-2005 05:39  Finland
Click Here to See the Profile for -mk- Click here to Send -mk- a Private Message Visit -mk-'s homepage! Add -mk- to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Axolotyl
hired goon



Registered: Feb 2005
Location: atoms are not things they are possibilities
Re: Re: Is software catching up?

quote:
Originally posted by -mk-
Thought it looks and sounds like NL2? Anyways the sound is very similar(sampled waveforms from the original perhaps?), but the filters dont quite cut it. They come close, but not enough. And the plugin doesnt have a unison(which is very important in some keysounds ive done with NL1). The sound has differences in grittiness too, but this is more likely due to the difference between NL1 and NL2. I have NL1 so comparing it to a NL2-clone wont work so great(tho they should be pretty much the same sounding) It beats most crappy softsynths tho 100-0. And bear in mind the original awesome sounding NL1 is from 1995.. so catching up eh?


Yeah your right, it looks more like the NL2.. doesnt have those funky leds that the NL3 has I've been using Discovery a fair bit this past week and your right... it doesn't come close to the real thing. It has a similar sound, but the filters just dont hold it together aswell as the hardware. I dont have a nord of my own, so I cant do an a/b comparison but the FM just doesnt sound as hard from what I remember.

I would still have to say its the best nord emulator VST so far... Plus its red


___________________

Old Post Jul-20-2005 14:00  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for Axolotyl Click here to Send Axolotyl a Private Message Add Axolotyl to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
-mk-
tranceaddict



Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Tampere, Finland
Re: Re: Re: Is software catching up?

quote:
Originally posted by Axolotyl
Plus its red

Ye that always helps


Just got reminded today why i love that sexy red beats so much. I did an square/saw/FM/unison lead with it fckin brilliant. Bites the hell out of other synths. Its so nasty sounding. GRAuuuu :P


___________________
-
Matti Kotala
-mk-
www.mkdr.net

Old Post Jul-20-2005 17:46  Finland
Click Here to See the Profile for -mk- Click here to Send -mk- a Private Message Visit -mk-'s homepage! Add -mk- to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Is software catching up?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (2): [1] 2 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbacklast one [2003] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playback4 strings - sunrise [2005]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 18:46.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!