|
Re: Digital Cameras?
| quote: | Originally posted by djbruuen
i want to get a digicam soon, and want one that has really good picture quality and pocket size...when i look at ppl's picks from places like guv...sometimes they like they get blurry in places and others, look crystal sharpness (i obviously want one like the latter)
i've been looking at the canon sd500
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/c...t_sd500-review/
what u think? i'd like to hear from the ppl with those really sharp cam's in clubs to (minus the canon digital rebel ppl  thats way outta my league) |
i sold digi cams for 2 years, any of the canon sds are pretty much the best for a small compact camera. I have the sd 300, had the s230 and s200 before that, never regretted buying one of them.
if i was gonna buy another one, it'd be the sd450. 7.1 mega pixels (sd500) is completely useless and in no way makes the picture better quality, the lense makes the difference and they pretty much use the same one on all that series. 5 megapixles is more than enough. I'd even get the sd400 if ur stuck for money, think the only diff is the screen size really.
last i knew the next best compact camera was the pentax series, but its not as good as canon....stick with canon.
|
otherwise i'd have bought that instead of canon. They have all these crazy small ones too, they're ok but the lense is just too smal, you'll never get the pictures you say like you want from them.
