 |
|
|
|
 |
tranceinjection
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2006
Location:
|
|
|
I would just move the melody or bass line so they aren’t occupying the same frequencies.
Some people would just say equalise one of the melodies or bass line so they aren’t making your tune sound muddy.
You could also try using a filter if they are playing the same melody, or just try a filter and see what happens.
If you have two instruments playing the same melody get one to play the bass notes and the other to play the high notes, that way you get to keep the two instruments sounds you like.
Lots of ways to do things, you could try and space out the patterns so that the two instruments don’t plat at the same time avoiding the muddiness.
Hope it works out
|
|
May-27-2006 11:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
Derivative
Bipolar Bear
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
|
|
|
I think this is worth pointing out:
Every instrument at some point occupies every audible frequency. However, most of the high amplitude component is usually confined to a smaller range.
I.E. A bog standard 909 kick drum sample occupies pretty much every audible frequency from less than 20hz to beyond 20,000hz. But the highest amplitude component is typically between 50 and 500 hz.
However, if you were to use an EQ to kill all the frequency eitherside of 50 and 500 hz, that kick drum would sound totally shit.
When you have more than 1 instrument, Overlap *will* be inevitable. There are only a few instances I can think of where this wouldnt be the case - for instance, an 808 kick drum which has virtually no presense above 7000hz and a 909 off hat sample which you can low shelf below 5000hz without changing much in the way of the texture and tone of the sound. But thats only because the highest amplitude component of each sound are (figuratively speaking) miles apart.
Overlap is inevitable with mid range/lead type instruments and bass instruments so dont even try using filters/EQs to destroy large parts of the sound so you can get a square block into a round hole.
You are missing out stereo width. You can have 2 identical sounds, with identical amplitude peaks across identical frequency ranges but increasing the stereo width of 1 of them, will make them not overlap so much. Its hard to explain but stereo width is commonly thought of as the Z axis of a Frequency/Amplitude X/Y spectrum. Experiment with that, panning and subtle amounts of detune to get around the phasing problems that may occur when you do this. You should be able to get away with a few instruments peaking in the same frequency range, provided they arent both exactly in phase at the same time.
|
|
May-27-2006 14:22
|
|
|
 |
 |
Derivative
Bipolar Bear
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
|
|
|
| quote: | | No two samples should cover the same frequency range as the other with close to equal amplitude, otherwise you'll get mudd. |
99% of the time this isnt possible unless you use filters to kill whole frequency ranges on certain instruments. Most of the time this is BAD.
Spectrum analysers are useful no doubt but they only graph amplitude over frequency. They do not take into account the 3rd axis - stereo width.
Come on guys, the advise about having instruments never sharing the same frequency range is not only wrong but also misleading.
Run a spectrum analysis of pretty much any instrument. Even instruments like snare drums which have a very narrow band have some presence in every audible frequency above its fundamental. Theres even some below it too. Nearly every real word sound has presence at every audible level, some greater than others but...The more instruments you add the more it will pile up and you cant EQ/Filter it all out without making something sound totally unnatural.
For any instrument that ends up having to sit between sub bass and sibilant high hats, overlapping frequency ranges is inevitable. It is impossible to write a song where no frequency ranges overlap. Not one that sounds half good anyway.
Stereo width, stereo width, stereo width. You can have 2 similar sounds with similar amplitudes and frequency distributions playing at the same time if they have enough stereo separation. So many people here are still thinking of audio design in two dimensions and are ignoring phase completely. Its an important property of sound, especially if you are mixing in stereo. And pretty much everyone here will be mixing in stereo.
|
|
May-28-2006 01:51
|
|
|
 |
 |
PutBoy
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Dec 2004
Location: LA (Landskrona)
|
|
|
Re: Same Frequencies ?
| quote: | Originally posted by funkysouls
It happens so many times that 2 different instruments or more use the same frequencies.
Hence, none of them could be heard properly due to the mudiness it creates.
Now, how do i correct that in Reason.
I got my kick and syth messing it up completely for me. |
IF you got two leads that's using the same frequencies, then just pan them.
In your case you could try to stereo seperate, or whatever it's called, the synth more.
But the best way is to EQ it. I would suggest you want the kick to stand out, so find the corresponding frequencies for the kick and the synth, and cut them out from the synth. You could say that this would make the synth sound shit. Well, yes alone, but not in the mix. IF, however, it sound shitty in the mix, then find the frequence you cut out that makes it sound shitty, and instead cut it from the kick.
___________________
Check out Crossfade Collective
Sebastian Zander - Hotel Chaplin
Sebastian Zander - Set Two [Electro/Tech House and Trance of some sort]
Paulo Da Costa - AVGN [Prog. House](128kbps])
|
|
May-28-2006 08:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
funkysouls
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
Re: Re: Same Frequencies ?
| quote: | Originally posted by PutBoy
IF you got two leads that's using the same frequencies, then just pan them.
In your case you could try to stereo seperate, or whatever it's called, the synth more.
But the best way is to EQ it. I would suggest you want the kick to stand out, so find the corresponding frequencies for the kick and the synth, and cut them out from the synth. You could say that this would make the synth sound shit. Well, yes alone, but not in the mix. IF, however, it sound shitty in the mix, then find the frequence you cut out that makes it sound shitty, and instead cut it from the kick. |
Well, if it sounds shit when i m playing it alone, this can be fixed by duplicating the synth track ( without EQ )and playing it wen the lead plays solo.
will definately give it a try.
@ Derivative.
Its so true that its impossible to write a song where instruments aren't sharing same frequencies unless theer are very less instruments used but
Stereo Seperation.. how do i go about it ?
@ substorm.
Yeah, even a frequency analyser can do it i think.
I'll try google the tutorial.
Thnaks very much peeps.
IF anyone with a more definate idea of how to go about with it in Reason, pleaseeeee !
|
|
May-28-2006 09:43
|
|
|
 |
 |
PutBoy
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Dec 2004
Location: LA (Landskrona)
|
|
|
May-28-2006 10:05
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|