 |
|
|
|
 |
Low Profile
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Akureyri
|
|
|
I think you're trying to hard to break up the motion of the melody, it sounds like it's *trying too hard*, the general melody is good, but sounds a bit cluttered. I can't really explain it better...
|
|
Aug-05-2006 20:54
|
|
|
 |
 |
RivalMan
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
|
|
Appreciate the responses. I think I understand your point about the melody "trying to hard".
The thing is, I'd been reading this music theory book the last couple of days on how to construct counterpoints, more complex melodies and chord progressions. (I was fed up with realizing that all my melodies always ended up too simple, consisting of the same I, IV, V-chords as well as melodies made out of the pentatonic scale).
Anyway, one of the key take-aways from the book was to avoid the "moving in parallel"-thing in regards to vertical as well as horizontal movements. I.e. to avoid having the bassline change at the same time as the melody as well as to avoid having them changing in the same direction.
Well, I think I managed to compose something complex ;-) but probably a little bit too much though. I'll scrap it and have another go tomorrow, keeping in mind that the hook needs to be the outmost important thing and not hidden away under a complex progression.
Thanx guys... Appreciate the honesty.
___________________
RiValMan
- Pumping the bits using:
My beloved MacBook Pro, Logic Pro X, UAD hardware and software and tons of plug-ins...
|
|
Aug-05-2006 23:00
|
|
|
 |
 |
RivalMan
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by David Adams
I liked the piece, but as was indicated by your friend, it might not go well in a trance track because it seems to go past 8 measures.
This piece would be good for a WWII game title screen.
That book you mention, is that the Idiot's Guide to Music Theory? I have that book too and it does mention the parallel thing. |
As of matter of fact it is that very book Suppose that makes me an idiot
Anyway, I just finished reading the book from a to z. It was rather good I think. I've been composing and producing music for years, but really felt more and more recently that I missed a lot of fundamental knowledge about scales, chords etc. I think I've learned a lot of usefull stuff from reading that book.
Now all I need to do is practice, practice and practice...
Regards
___________________
RiValMan
- Pumping the bits using:
My beloved MacBook Pro, Logic Pro X, UAD hardware and software and tons of plug-ins...
|
|
Aug-06-2006 18:42
|
|
|
 |
 |
lazybassplayer
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: New York, USA
|
|
|
There seemed to be a little too much motion in the bass for my tastes...
Also, if you really wanted to avoid some parallelisms but have a little less motion in the bass and lead is to add some more voices to beef up your chords. This way you can have full chordal changes with less going on in the bass and lead voices, which might work in a trance situation..
|
|
Aug-07-2006 16:45
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:14.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|