 |
|
|
|
 |
Freak
Insert witty comment here

Registered: Jul 2003
Location: On a plane probably...
|
|
|
Aug-15-2006 19:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
skip
a.k.a. skip2

Registered: Sep 2002
Location: home or somewhere else
|
|
|
Aug-15-2006 20:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
Allen Mueller
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: New Jersey
|
|
|
I've got a Urei and a Bozak. Its no big deal to not have eq's it forces you to work harder on your track selection. For me it makes my sets better because I can't get away with using eq's to mix two tracks that don't quite match up.
If your concerned about not haveing eq's there are plenty of good mixers that have eq's and rotary.
If you want the ultimate in sound, i'd say go with a urei. Its lack per channel eq's is part of why it has such a good sound.
Allen
|
|
Aug-15-2006 21:30
|
|
|
 |
 |
ZeJayMan
the farthammer

Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Glasgow
|
|
|
Aug-15-2006 21:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
sr126
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Aug 2005
Location: los angeles, usa
|
|
|
go for the carl cox mixer, the pmc-cx. it replaced the pmc-37, and you can also pick up a rotary kit if you want to experiment.
to me that seems to be the best way to go. you will have all the features that modern mixers have, like eq, individual gains, panning, cueing options, etc. and if you want to mix urie style, you can do that too on the pmc-cx. just set all the gains to about 3 oclock or what ever, and just don't touch the eq at all. it's a totally different style of mixing tho... you don't go all the way w/the rotary control, if you tracks peak @ 0db when the dial is set at 7. -you just match all the other tracks to that. if the next track is louder, then that track will peak before you get to 7. if the next track is softer, then you will have room to go past 7 to match the volume.
i'm using a pmc55 w/rotary kit, and i can't live w/out it. i still mix the same way i always do, by tweaking the gain on every track before i bring it in, and crank the dials to 10. actaully, when i'm mixing 2 tracks at equal volume, -the equivalent of having the crossfader in the middle. both dials around 8 to keep the master from going too far into the red. but when one song is playing, the dial is at 10.
once you get used to mixing on the rotary, you will notice that you don't need to use the eq much to get a clean blend. actually it's pretty rare when i touch the eq now. i like it better that way.
___________________
|
|
Aug-16-2006 06:09
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
I've got the 92 rotary, and I've used a Rane 2016 and Urei 1620.
You can mix very well on the 92 without ever thouching the EQ's.
| quote: | Originally posted by ZeJayMan
The Carl Cox mixer is twice as much as i can afford to spend on a mixer, it looks stunning and all, but it's a grand over here, the Urei I can pick up costs half that.
Does anyone have any ideas on how could go about mounting it?
And no, not that kind of mounting, not Brokeback Mounting style, I love quality mixers and all, but that's a step too far. |
|
|
Aug-17-2006 00:15
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:36.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|