 |
|
|
|
 |
Col
Strachan
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Montreal, QC
|
|
|
They should give it a more professional name if they want it to be taken seriously.
"FruityLoops" just sounds entry-level and shitty.
___________________
Strachan :: DJ & Producer :: Official Website
|
|
Aug-28-2006 12:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
thoughtlessjex
Yakkity Yak

Registered: May 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, North Carolina
|
|
|
Re: FL Studio Producer Edition XXL
| quote: | Originally posted by xiad
OK, I honestly don't get why everyone is hating on FL studio. I admit the lower versions are crap and their presets are even worse, but has no one tried using the XXL producer edition. It takes FL's ease of use and combines it with some amazing synths & effects. They Sytrus plugin is absolutely amazing and is easily manipulatable.
Plus, the price range is very similar to other production apps (with exception of AbletonLive & Protools).
So PLEASE someone explain why FL is hated on so much!? Just because its easier to use doesn't mean its shit. After all, it is ALL about the music and how good it is. Great producers can make anything sound good on what ever they use, and shit producers will sound shit on anything, even if its Protools! |
To be honest, I haven't heard anyone rag on FL explicitly in a long time. True, people don't give it the credit that they give sequencers like Cubase and Logic, but then those ones actually deserve a bit more credit.
___________________

www.jexmusic.com - My website
|
|
Aug-28-2006 13:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
Derivative
Bipolar Bear
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
|
|
|
The only reason they deserve more credit is because they are the closest thing to an industry wide standard in this business. Pro Tools would take the top honour as pretty much every professional recording facility has some sort of Pro Tools rig.
If you do a production/recording course, they will teach you on (surprise surprise) Pro Tools and Cubase/Logic.
So Cubase/Logic get credit for being used by the most people in the most professional studio environments, at least on the DAW front. For workflow reasons thats a god send because you can ship your projects onto CD and work on a tune anywhere, anytime. You can't do that with FL Studio because it doesn't have industry wide acceptance - you can go to a recording studio and theres an even chance they wont have it. Shit luck I suppose...
|
|
Aug-28-2006 14:45
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:30.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|