it's horrible & redudant. Oakenfold butchers His & Steve Osbourne (heavy emphasis on osbourne)'s classic.

___________________
facebook | blog | scrobbler | setarchive | 20160316
"I believe that's referred to as intelligent drum & bass, which obviously means there's a genre of stupid drum & bass out there" (John Peel)

Are you talking about the track itself? There are 2 Mixes from Oakenfold that I know of... And of course, Thats your Opinion. I happen to really enjoy the track.

Grace = Paul Oakenfold, Steve Osbourne & Dominique Atkins

Osbourne & Oakenfold produced the original Not Over Yet in 1993 with Dominique Atkins on vocals

1995 came BT Mixes

1999 came the Breeder Mixes (and also some shit remixes by Anthony Acid & DJ Skribble)

2006 came Oakenfold's Remake. it's horrible, it's redudant. and it's just yet another sign thtat oakenfold is just a washed up, out-of-ideas, talantless monkey

___________________
facebook | blog | scrobbler | setarchive | 20160316
"I believe that's referred to as intelligent drum & bass, which obviously means there's a genre of stupid drum & bass out there" (John Peel)

Sounds like something Anjunabeats would churn out.

___________________
Everyone has an opinion. Mine just happens to be a little more informed than most.
Electronic Music Critic: Near-Daily Ruminations Of Music I Own, In Alphabetical Order!

Now see, The original from 1993 has Horrable Vocals i think. The Newer one is much Cleaner and Strait Forward IMHO Of Course... Because a DJ Mixes a Tune doesnt neccesaraly mean he is out of ideas, maybe he thought he could better the song?

quote:

Originally posted by DJ Legs Now see, The original from 1993 has Horrable Vocals i think. The Newer one is much Cleaner and Strait Forward IMHO Of Course... Because a DJ Mixes a Tune doesnt neccesaraly mean he is out of ideas, maybe he thought he could better the song?

you must be joking

___________________
facebook | blog | scrobbler | setarchive | 20160316
"I believe that's referred to as intelligent drum & bass, which obviously means there's a genre of stupid drum & bass out there" (John Peel)

quote:

Originally posted by DJ Legs Now see, The original from 1993 has Horrable Vocals i think. The Newer one is much Cleaner and Strait Forward IMHO Of Course... Because a DJ Mixes a Tune doesnt neccesaraly mean he is out of ideas, maybe he thought he could better the song?

He tried to better CJ Bolland - The Prophet on his last album. I loled.

I like the new vocals and the new lyrics, the melodies and the production aren't that exciting, so overall it's a decent tune i would say.

"Paul Oakenfold - Not Over" ?

More like "Paul Oakenfold - DEFINITELY Over"

He should take his money and retire quietly, rather than embarrass himself with pathetic mixing and awful remixes of classic tunes.

___________________
Discogs: FOR SALE!

I don't think those two songs should even be compared. This is so different from the old one it's a totally new song.

quote:

Originally posted by SkooB_E I don't think those two songs should even be compared. This is so different from the old one it's a totally new song.

I agree. Although I do like the updated version.

___________________
Click the link below to stream all of my mixes past and present. New mixes go up about once a month. Enjoy!

www.mixcloud.com/jluger