|
| quote: | Originally posted by djdk
Now this works on the principle that the backgroud noise is distinctly different from the audio signal that you're trying to listen to. When you're DJing, most of the time the background noise is going to be the same as the audio you're trying to listen to, meaning that the system is also going to cancel out some of that.
|
Close dave...the bose headphones will try to cancel out whatever it hears that is not the same signal being fed into it. While true, if dj'ing, what's in your headphones may also be what is pumping out throught the monitors, it's not the exact same signal so the headphones will still try to cancel it out.
But why I think the bose headphones aren't suited for dj use...is that I would imagine it would have a hard time significantly reducing anything played at a club volume. active control (technology of cancelling out noise) has not developed perfectly yet and is limited to the speed of signal processors kicking out a perfect 180 phase cancelling signal, the accuracy of the microphones picking up whatever needs to be cancelled, and the accuracy of the transducers to playback the phase cancelling signal perfectly.
in simple terms, to significantly reduce the volume of a dance track from a 10k system through bose headphones is just too difficult. if it was white noise, then you'd get a decent reduction....but with actual played music, not a chance. furthermore, in theory, to cancel out a dance track at 90+ dB..you'd need roughly the same amount of energy in the phase-cancelling signal....which...isn't likely.
active control is still very new but developing fast, and i wouldn't be surprised if something comes out soon enough tho.
sidenote: my masters thesis was on active control of panels...a phd student at the time was able to cancel out a 60 Hz tone by up to 30-35 dB...useful if you live next door to a dj eh? 
___________________
|