 |
|
|
|
 |
Michael Russo
mmm mmm prog
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
|
Music changes, it cant be stagnant.
About "that epic stuff from '99"... eventually, every song had a five minute breakdown in it, and trance was getting way too commercial (therefore formulaic and repetitive, with no innovation). So the sounds have to change. I like the new progressive stuff, but I still like epic, uplifting stuff more. Personally, I think that there is still enough good trance being made, so I'm happy. And I think PvD, Tiesto, Corsten etc. are still playing good music (but I think punk is a brutal, brutal, brutal song).
|
|
Mar-24-2002 19:54
|
|
|
 |
 |
Spin Doctor
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Outside Over There
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by PSi
they are genre mixing, using tracks that would regularely be played by big name house and breakbeat dj's. |
You're totally right there PSi. Back in the good old days (EEK! I'm starting to sound like an old man!) it was relatively easy to pigeon hole a track by genre. These days it's becoming increasingly difficult to say "that's Trance" or "that's House." The lines between what genre a track actually is has become incredibly blurred. Here is an example. Take DJ Tiesto - Flight 643. Going by the formula of '98/'99 Trance then you couldn't call this a trance track, it doesn't have a extensively large breakdown and the main melody continues for about 70% of the track. However for all realistic purposes, this is a trance track.
The reason this is happening isn't with finding "the next big thing." Well I lie, with some less respectable DJ's who's names won't be mentioned it is, but in the main stay it's just an effort to fight becoming stale. Think about this, if every club in the country had classic '98/'99 trance spinning and nothing else, despite the fact that it would be really great at first, we'd soon tire of it and the classics would no longer be classics, they'd get over played and ruined. People naturally crave new material and something that's different.
Also, with the ‘98/’99 trance, producers were seeing what an impact these really euphoric/epic tracks were making and blatantly copying each other. Tunes were becoming formulaic; a large proportion of trance was no longer trance by feeling but trance by numbers. On top of this the money grabbing goons who run the commercial side of the music industry cashed in on the success of these tunes and it all became way too commercial, something that I feel we are still suffering from today.
Last edited by Spin Doctor on Mar-25-2002 at 01:44
|
|
Mar-25-2002 01:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
evil_bastard
Newcastle United

Registered: Dec 2001
Location:
|
|
Trance is changing in some big ways. Just look at how many epic trance DJs have entered the world of felopian hardcore, and how many have gone down the cheesy path of rhetorical trance.
I think traditional genres such as Pelvic trance and Malicous techno will still be around for some time to come. DJ Sinister's razor sharp beats, wicked scratching and lethal synths have been absolute killers. His reign of "technics terror" as the media have dubbed it has kept the malicous techno world from going all commercial.
There will always be cheesy trance tunes. Take DJ Irresponsible's latest hit - "Drugs are cool (take loads of them kids)" - complete cheese. There will always be underground, too, DJ Oestrogen being a good example.
"Fucke - We Add the E" has already rightly been highlighted in another thread as an example of the musical fusion, which might be the next big thing?
HLDSHA003, you seem to be a bit of a bestial trance man yourself. Far from being a "beast" I see this music as more of a "sound", or a "collection of sounds" to be precise (but then I am a sonic techno man myself).
Check out:
DJ Plebiscite - Referendum
Paul van Driver - Speed Limit
DJ Lazy - Will this do?
DJ Acid vs MC Alkali - Neutrality
But for my money, there's not much at the moment that can top the best example's of DJ Boring's style of Bland Trance, espescially the classic "Zzzzz".
Regards,
EB
|
|
Mar-25-2002 14:33
|
|
|
 |
 |
evil_bastard
Newcastle United

Registered: Dec 2001
Location:
|
|
|
Mar-26-2002 12:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
kolkiewolkie
muziekjunk
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
|
|
trance indeed has changed over the past few years... but I don't think it is all that bad... it made the genre more various then ever, which only can be a good thing because always the same thing would get boring in the end.
and don't say: back in the days when blablabla, because you would say that EVERY dj has left that path of trance.....but that is not true at all.... BIG dj's indeed spin different then back in '99, but some less bigger have not. I, as example, went to see misja helsloot a couple of weeks ago. and he just spun the pure sound of '99 trance, LOVELY!! but if every dj would still spin like that it would get boring, wouldn't it? therefor I am happy the music changes and keeps changing, cos it makes the genre more various and you get surprised every time! and you will always keep dj's who don't change, and that is a good thing too, because THEN you enjoy the 'older-which-could-get-boring-but-then-was-replaced-by-different' trance even MORE then before
but this is ofcourse my opinion...
___________________
Progressive
Hard = goed
|
|
Mar-26-2002 13:24
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:32.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|