|
Has it really killed the music?
Armin, Tiesto, PVD, Oakenfold, Gielen and others would be nothing over here if it was not for mp3's. I can see the business side of the argument but does it really stop ppl who buy cd's on a regular basis and ppl who buy records on a regular basis. No, it does not because those ppl like to do that. You have the same people who burn albums and don't buy a thing and never go to clubs, those ppl need a beating because they are a drain on the music scene and are not helping it. Like I refuse to download albums, I want an album, I'll go buy it at hmv or a used cd store or trade with a friend. You can burn things but the store bought cd still sounds better and the cover art and the inlays. Producers and Deejays will still argue that mp3's are killing the scene but it has helped the scene get a bigger exposure. The argument that it is killing the scene, I truly don't believe because if it was not for mp3's then I would not be into trance. I heard xpander on mp3 and got hooked. I've been to many gigs and bought many cd's and people like me are a benefit to the scene because we continually buy things. There is no proof that the mp3's have hurt the scene because look at bonzai going broke, was it 100% because of the mp3's, i sincerely doubt it, add bad management and release records no one buys and mp3's then it adds up. You think Tiesto would be as big as he is today without mp3's, i doubt it. Most labels compare their sales to the 1999-2000 era and that was the boom in terms of economic activity and the trance boom and they compare that also. Another problem is that most promoters or record label people are not trained business people who understand how to effectively market their stuff. You can't keep selling the same crap to the same crap over 10 yrs and expect nothing to change. As nick warren pointed out that nothing in the music industry stands still. Are mp3's the real problem? maybe they are just one of many scapegoats in an industry that refuses to accept reality.
|