|
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Well what exactly are you supporting then by alienating yourself from the cause, or more like agenda, they're implementing? It doesn't matter if they're just "taking orders" or are unaware of why exactly they're there. If you're going to join a brainwashing institution like the army you're kind of responsible for that decision and everything that follows from it. Military personel are pawns of the goverment, their identity as soldiers that is. So what does "supporting the troops" mean to you? |
I am more talking about Bushies, or people who blindly support him and whatever he does. People who take orders from Bush or soldiers who do. I don't hear it as often, but you still hear Cheney talk about it and probably from those who still support the war (which is probably fewer and fewer nowadays, most polls show more than half of the American people are against it).
To me, supporting the troops means looking out for their best interests (including giving them proper medical care, armor, pay etc, all of which isn't being done) and only putting them in places where they are absolutely needed. War should be a last resort, and our military is being stretched too thin. The war was rushed, without any foresight, not properly planning, and should have never happend in the first place. So a smaller military presence in Iraq, used for security purposes, less in the line of fire, should be our goal. So I would support a phased withdraw. At the rate we are going in Iraq, we will be in their forever and loose more troops, while Sadr builds up his support (he seems to have more support right now than the Iraqi government) and his army of course...and chase us out, which they are doing....
Last edited by Spirit5 on Apr-16-2007 at 05:28
|