|
Just a bit of discussion
ASCAP, along with BMI, collect royalties for songwriters and artists. They are not affiliated with the RIAA. This money is FTMP not going to labels and distributors but to composers. These are non-profit organizations set up to ensure that those who create get their piece of the profits. It is the American equivalent of SESAC.
Most people who decry the owners of copyright and enforcers of property rights do so with a byline supporting an artist receiving their share. In this case, that is exactly what is happening; a non-profit retained by an artist is collecting royalties to distribute amongst it's members.
In this case, the coffee shop hosted a "live preformance" of an ASCAP artist's song (a cover). Similar to playing cds over a store stereo, the owner of the shop is required to license the music from ASCAP (The figures provided in the article break down to about 1.10 per day if ASCAP's fee is annual). Here is ASCAP's General FAQ
How do you perceive this action? What is wrong with the scenario and how would you fix it?
___________________
Im not not licking toads!
No more trees
Last edited by OhioTranceFan on Jul-10-2007 at 05:12
|