 |
|
|
|
 |
cybernetica
Captain Insano

Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Cologne, Germany
|
|
|
Hey,
azndragon pretty much covered the most important stuff.
I see you have way more highs now in your mix, which is good. Probably its a bit too much upper mid frequencies here now. I think its all about finding the proper balance of elements. Its a little trial and error, I know. I always suggest you compare your tracks to professional releases and see how things are balanced. Maybe use a frequency analyzer to compare the frequencies used.
Oh, and still try to find better hihat samples, the ones you have used are a little simple and repetitive. In the offbeat I would use an open hihat that has a longer sustain and less ticking, it usually sounds better and feels more "real".
I suggest you bring down the levels of your hihat and bring up the leads a little more. I think that your lead melody is pretty cool, I dig it!
The kick is pretty nice, but the bass needs a little more mid range frequencies. There are several ways to proceed. One is to split your bass into mid bass and sub bass with corresponding highpass and lowpass filters. One is to use a more present type of bassline, I recommend audiorealism Bassline or Steinberg VB-1 for creating a rich Psytrance bassline covering a wide frequency spectrum. Then you should use short notes to make sure your bass is crisp. The other way to help making your bassline more dominant is compression. On my basslines I usually use quite a hard level of compression, bringing the bassline as much to the limit as possible.
Songwriting-wise, the breakdown is pretty uninteresting, and the piano is almost not noticeable. Some more action than fading out and fading stuff back in would be nice.
As for the clipping, to prevent that its usually a good idea to use a limiter set to 0.0dB on the master channel which will prevent all frequencies above from clipping through. But be careful, if your levels are way too high above the 0.0dB mark, the limiter will induce a pumping effect, especially on good systems and with louder volume you will notice that your track is lacking a lot of energy.
So if you are planning a professionally mastered release, the label will sometimes demand that your max peaks of your final mix are below -3dB, to make a good mastering possible. So I always suggest you turn up your speakers and start off with lower overall channel levels. First of all its easier to balance things against each other, second you can make sure you dont make things clipping.
I suggest you dont try to fix your track too much, its usually making things worse instead of improving. instead you better start a new track keeping the advice you got in mind. I would say thats usually a better way to improve.
___________________
Cybernetika albums (free DL): Atropos (2009) | Nanospheric (2008) | Neural Network Expansion (2007) | Promo #1 (2006) | Paralysis (2005)
homepage: http://www.cybernetika.de
|
|
Jul-10-2007 13:36
|
|
|
 |
 |
Lockdown
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, California, USA
|
|
|
Yo Agent -
I took a listen to your tune. The melody is really nice, the order of everything is pretty smooth. I like the intro, it flows well with how the kick and everything else comes in.
I think the bass should be brought out a bit. The volume on the bass is good but some frequencies on the bass channel should be increased it sounds like, maybe around 100-200 hertz.
Maybe change up that main crash that hits at 5:13 for example. Or maybe just roll off some lower frequencies, it doesnt sound very natural but its not bad.
Nice white noise effects. Lead sounds good. Your transitions are pretty smooth also, there was never a point where I was sort of surprised or anything.
One thing is to maybe work on your build during the break. This is REALLY hard i think, well it is for me but I think its essential. Something to get the listeners excited about the drop that is coming up.
Overall its a good track, with some improvements it would be a great track.
And by the way a 7-8 DB increase on an EQ is quite a big increase, The reason that you dont hear a difference with using smaller increases i believe is because that frequency range is so cluttered and has a lot of sound going on there. I would say to try a 3-4 DB increase (which is still kind of big) or a 1-2 DB increase. If you cant hear a difference then maybe you should work on the sounds that are in that same frequency range and decrease there 'precense' a bit. Thats my non-professional opinion 
|
|
Jul-11-2007 16:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:25.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|