 |
|
|
|
 |
Reno
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: London
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Subtle
Depends on the amount of voices actually used per channel.
8 channels is already quite alot, you should be happy with that amount and start converting to audio if you need more. |
Thing is converting to audio isn't practical as I can't use automation and since I haven't finished the track yet, not sure how I may want to automate the patch later in the track.
I hear you though just dissapointed.
cheers
___________________
http://www.mp3unsigned.com/showband.asp?ID=15771
http://www.myspace.com/renofinch
|
|
Feb-22-2008 11:16
|
|
|
 |
 |
Reno
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: London
|
|
|
Actually quick question - is there any way of telling how many voices a patch is using? I thought the Virus has over 100 voices?
___________________
http://www.mp3unsigned.com/showband.asp?ID=15771
http://www.myspace.com/renofinch
|
|
Feb-22-2008 11:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
I don't have a TI (my virus is a KC) - I've seen a number of posts dealing with note dropouts/ TI's polyphony not seeming to be as many voices as advertised. I don't know if there's a way of telling how many voices are being used, it would probably depend on things like the release setting of the amp envelope, if some notes are still dying away then the synth should use new voices rather than cut off the release section of the previous voices. But if you're already using it for 8 separate parts, I'd be quite happy with that.
However, on that issue - using one synth for 8 different parts in the same track is going to make the whole character of the track the character of that synth. Each synth has it's own sound and it sounds fantastic when you have all these different sonic characters combining to create an incredibly beautiful track with many different textures. If you have some vsts, I would definitely recommend using them for some sounds, otherwise the track will be very Virus TI-ey and potentially much more..what's the word..."monotonal?" than it could be.
I try not to use one synth for more than two elements in a song if possible. I love the blending of many synth's characters.
|
|
Feb-22-2008 14:19
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
No Left Turn
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: San Francisco
|
|
|
The TI's polyphony is somewhere around 80 voices. Their site says this is under average conditions. Remember that patches with Unison and Delay/Reverb will take up extra voices as well. If you have any combination of these parameters on your patches, then I imagine with 8 parts, you're already over the 80 polyphony limit.
If you use the analog outputs in Virus|Control, you can use any type of External Instruments feature (a la Cubase/Live/Logic) and you should still be able to do automation on it.
|
|
Feb-22-2008 16:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
Sean Walsh
JAGERMAESTRO
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
|
|
|
That's a hell of a lot of virus patches for a single track. Are you seriously not happy enough with any of the sounds to bounce them off?
I'd spend some time finalizing the sounds you're using and then bouncing them off before adding more.
___________________
"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading."
|
|
Feb-22-2008 21:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
I agree, lock it down to audio, commit to it. Otherwise you're going to spend forever just making one more tweak...one more tweak...
Though, having said that, I also went through that phase a while back, so maybe it's something producers just have to go through for themselves.
In any case, if you lock it down and then don't like the filter automation, just re-record the part. As Sean said, surely there are some parts you are happy with? Lock down all the ones you're happy with currently and focus on the ones that aren't quite there.
Or grab a few more synths, that will give you different textures to work into your tracks and you'll never need to care what a synth's polyphony is...if you're using the TI for only an element or two, they're going to need to be pretty complex to max out the polyphony.
|
|
Feb-22-2008 23:04
|
|
|
 |
 |
No Left Turn
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: San Francisco
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Eldritch
I think it goes without saying you can't do automation on a bounced synth. Why would using the analog outs be any different? |
"External Instrument" track features work like this. You have a hardware synth with outputs going into your audio interface. Your sequencer with the External Instrument feature will allow you to use those inputs on your audio interface "like a virtual instrument", meaning you just write/record any midi that you want and you don't have to bounce anything to audio. Thus, giving you the ability to add any automation and not have to commit it right away.
|
|
Feb-23-2008 21:00
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
How is the "external instrument" track feature related to the original question? How is the feature going to help increase the Virus TI's polyphony, so Reno doesn't have notes dropping out?
|
|
Feb-23-2008 23:00
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:59.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|