Creamware/powercore/UAD? Which one is best and why?
Also what are the advantages using these DSP plugins today compared to the VST's?
Aug-25-2008 13:54
Storyteller
Supreme tracneaddict
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: The Netherlands
UAD2 is coming, so if you want to buy uad, wait a bit .
There are 2 real advantages I can think of. The plugins don't load your CPU, and the qulaity of most plugins on the powercore and UAD are of amazing quality.
Downside, it's relatively expensive compared to common plugs.
And I think the UAD has a bit more of the kind of plugins I like.
Originally posted by kitphillips
no Grab a focusrite liquid mix instead, they do a wonderful VST integrated thing which sounds brilliant, at least it has physical controls.
Yeah I've been looking at the Liquid Mix for a while now, and it seems quite cheap for what you get. But AFAIK it's primarily aimed at ppl who want emulations of famous hardware EQ's and compressors. It has no support for any other types of effects or instruments, and I'd really like to covers as much of my "plugin needs" as possible when buying a DSP card.
Aug-25-2008 14:40
thecYrus
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2002
Location:
use native plugins. they are as good as DSP plugins.
Aug-25-2008 14:46
Storyteller
Supreme tracneaddict
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: The Netherlands
quote:
Originally posted by LfmC
Do they really sound that good?
Also which would you say was a "best buy" option? And how is the VST support?
Well I would say some specific plugins do sound very good, but most of those things also exist in VST .
Neither of the cards support VST as far as I know. You can't run a VST on one of the DSP's.
The earlier mentioned liquid mix is a very cheap solution which offers a lot features . It does more than the original hardware based unit and is about 5 times cheaper!
If less is more think about how much more more would be.
-Frasier
Aug-25-2008 15:28
dannib
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: midlands, uk
If you are mainly looking for eqs, compressors get UAD. The compressors are much nicer sounding than any native vst imo. If you are mainly looking for reverbs, powercore definately comes out on top. The VSS3 reverb puts most native algorithmic reverbs to shame.
I myself use both. I only use powercore for the virus plugin and VSS3 reverb. for everything else i use UAD.
UAD also has some exciting new products coming such as the empirical labs fatso, a moog filter etc.
Aug-25-2008 17:51
Ry Thomas
www.myspace.com/hardphaze
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Hardphaze HQ
UAD-2 is going to be immense
___________________
*** Sig edited -> no banner advertising in sigs
http://promote.beatport.com/images/labels/1253/12531-blue-468_60.jpg
Aug-25-2008 17:52
Red5un
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
It really depends on your needs.
IMO,
- Powercore for the reverbs
- UAD for compressors
- LiquidMix for compressors and EQ
- Creamware for signal routing and synths and a few excellent 3rd party reverbs.
Aug-25-2008 20:34
jupiterone
housin' guide
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: los angeles
quote:
Originally posted by LfmC
Yeah I've been looking at the Liquid Mix for a while now, and it seems quite cheap for what you get. But AFAIK it's primarily aimed at ppl who want emulations of famous hardware EQ's and compressors. It has no support for any other types of effects or instruments, and I'd really like to covers as much of my "plugin needs" as possible when buying a DSP card.
and it doesn't sound like the hardware it emulates, at all
it sounds good, but nothing like what it emulates
Aug-25-2008 22:30
Red5un
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
quote:
Originally posted by jupiterone
and it doesn't sound like the hardware it emulates, at all
it sounds good, but nothing like what it emulates
Emulations can get close, but they're not the real thing.
Just like a fake Paris Hilton can look good, she probably won't be as rich or as dumb as the original.