|
The features of the 1000's that you lose, are duplicated in the software, and in most cases, are better than the ones on the CDJ itself. For example, looping is much more accurate in Traktor Scratch/Serato, than trying to make manual loops on the CDJ-1000's.
The wave display is also nicer in the software packages. That being said, these days I'd say purchasing CDJ-800's makes more sense for use with a DVS. The extra features you get from jumping from the 800's to the 1000's are lost in combination with software. The only big difference is the CDJ-800 only has .05% pitch precision (which really isn't a BIG deal at all).
Now if you're going to be using Serato, I'd get the CDJ-400's. They are now natively supported in Serato, which means that you don't need control CD's, the CDJ's display shows you the correct track time and track name, and a bunch of the buttons for looping on the CDJ are automatically mapped out in the software for you. The CDJ-400's also have .02% pitch precision like the 1000's, the only thing you lose is the "big" jog wheel (no big deal AT ALL if you aren't scratching).
As for MIDI support on the DJM-800, it works but isn't overly useful or necessary in a DVS/CDJ setup.
|