 |
|
|
|
 |
|Thrax|
nightmoves.me

Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Sherman Oaks, Ca
|
|
|
Oct-16-2008 05:42
|
|
|
 |
 |
R!CH
check signal

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill
|
|
|
Oct-16-2008 05:48
|
|
|
 |
 |
R!CH
check signal

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill
|
|
|
Oct-16-2008 06:26
|
|
|
 |
 |
R!CH
check signal

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill
|
|
|
Oct-16-2008 06:38
|
|
|
 |
 |
R!CH
check signal

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by element-y
Look no offense but you are blind to some extent. The both of them really aren't that different if you really follow where they stand on issues. It is the campaigns that make the two seem vastly different. The supporters for each and the negative attacks etc. That is the only drastic thing that gets the two to be different from one another. Sure they differ here and there on some stuff, but in the end a politican does what is best, and both for the most part, have agreed on the majority of things. In this case, one is more eloquent then the other and so has the advantage to blind the uninformed. Not saying im going mccain, dont get me wrong, but having strong feelings like you do for one candidate and then almost going out of the way by making the other seem totally opposite and dumb is ridiculous to say the least. |
did you watch the debate? sounds like the answer to that is no. while they campaign on centrist platforms for the sake of winning a national election, they are fundamentally different in their temperament, style of leadership, policies and ideology. if you want to compare them in the spectrum of extremes from hitler to ghandi, sure they are relatively similar, but in the scope of american politics they contrast greatly in how they approach the big issues. how can you say they are essentially the same person when one stands by roe v wade and the other thinks it's a mistake? one wants to begin withdrawing from iraq immediately because our role there is done while the other thinks victory means maintaining a large force there for possibly another 100 years? one thinks we should relieve working class families of burden and the other thinks we should relieve large corporations of burden? one thinks biden makes a good vp and the other thinks palin makes a good vp? i mean are you serious??? look i'm pragmatic. while i'd love it if the libertarians or greens took the white house and the role of gov made a 180 for the better, we're dealing with reality here and in the real world there is only mccain or obama. so hell yea i'm excited about obama possibly being the next president! i don't see how my enthusiasm makes me blind or sheep-like as some of you suggest, but whatever. it's not like you're the first cynic i've ever come across...
___________________

|
|
Oct-16-2008 07:03
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:58.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|