|
| quote: | Originally posted by Pjotr G
I don't agree that 2+2=4 "just is". That you assume that it does fully relies on your interpretation of 2 and 4. If you teach a baby that "2" means the index, middle finger and thumb up (I'm avoiding the concept of "3") and you would leave 4 as it were in our society, then 2+2=4 does not hold.
hehe see you can provoke a stupid discussion even from the most innocent statements |
i guess i see what you're saying, but i choose not to read into things like that. i am looking at this with a baseline of information, assuming that we have been taught the same meaning of the numbers. i guess that could be a big assumption.
btw, i like your sig.
|