 |
|
|
|
 |
dannib
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: midlands, uk
|
|
|
| quote: | | Secondly, I've also been wondering about the proper use of the compressor. Mostly, (at least I used too) put the compressor on the end of the effects chain, but I've been reading about doing that in the beginning of the effects chain. How do you guys think about this? |
It depends what you want to achieve. If i am compressing a sound with lots of very low frequency content or rumble, i will use a high-pass filter or eq before the compressor.
If you eq first before the compressor, especially when boosting frequencies, the compressor will compress the frequencies you have just boosted, thus messing up your eq settings and gain structure. in this case i would use the compressor before the eq.
in other words i almost always use a compressor first in the chain. Otherwise the compressor will affect the processing you have done before.
You can also mix into the compressor to get different results.
Obviously there are no rules though. just do what sounds right to you!
|
|
Mar-10-2009 11:56
|
|
|
 |
 |
dannib
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: midlands, uk
|
|
|
What subtle said is spot on, i have an eq set up on all my percussion tracks. usually a UAD cambridge eq (wonderfull filter and slope options) I will solo the drums buss with all the percussion and remove unwanted frequencies on each individual percussion element.
i will usually never solo any of the percussion when eqing them. i listen to the drums as a whole and eq them seperately to get them working together.
i have had good results bussing out the percussion and using a slight bit of parallel compression/processing. Using something like a transient designer or snappy compressor such as the UAD DBX compressor on the parallel buss can really help bring your percussion to life and bring out the initial snap. You can mix in as much of this as you like when using parallel compression.
|
|
Mar-10-2009 12:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
Theran
One virus 2 rule them all

Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Far Far Away
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Subtle
Lowcut EQ everything that isnt bass gives me the clarity i need. |
I do this to, but how do you do it, do you cut i.e. below 200Hz, or do you start cutting where the sound begins (in the freq spectrum)?
| quote: | Originally posted by dannib
i have had good results bussing out the percussion and using a slight bit of parallel compression/processing. Using something like a transient designer or snappy compressor such as the UAD DBX compressor on the parallel buss can really help bring your percussion to life and bring out the initial snap. You can mix in as much of this as you like when using parallel compression. |
What is this parallel compression you are talking about? I heard a little something about it but I don't quite know how it works.
Another question I have is the following: I'm still using Cubase SX3, and although I'm really loving it, it's routing capabilities aren't that great. Now lately, I've been trying to SC a reverb from a synth track (so I don't want to Sc the synthsounds, but only the reverb), and somehow, I think this can't be done in SX3. I've already set up an FX channel with reverb on it and routed the synth to the FX channel, so I thought, than I could easily route the FX channel to the SC channel, but that isn't possible! I can only route it to the masterbus!?! Is there something I'm looking over or is it just not possible.
Another question regarding Cubase; is it possible to automate any effects on the masterbus? I can't seem to work that out.
Thanx again! 
___________________
Upcoming releases:
Hernandes ft. Stine Groove - Without You (Kyota remix) (Redux Recordings)
Kyota - Senegal (Flashover Recordings)
 
|
|
Mar-10-2009 13:10
|
|
|
 |
 |
Storyteller
Supreme tracneaddict

Registered: Feb 2005
Location: The Netherlands
|
|
|
Mar-10-2009 13:38
|
|
|
 |
 |
dannib
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: midlands, uk
|
|
|
| quote: | | Another question I have is the following: I'm still using Cubase SX3, and although I'm really loving it, it's routing capabilities aren't that great. Now lately, I've been trying to SC a reverb from a synth track (so I don't want to Sc the synthsounds, but only the reverb), and somehow, I think this can't be done in SX3. I've already set up an FX channel with reverb on it and routed the synth to the FX channel, so I thought, than I could easily route the FX channel to the SC channel, but that isn't possible! I can only route it to the masterbus!?! Is there something I'm looking over or is it just not possible. |
FX channels in cubase sx3 are useless. i never use them. Just use the group channel tracks instead. You can then route from one group to another. You can only route to group channles created after the one you are using though. I think newer versions of cubase support open group routings though?
Think im gonna update to cubase 5. i am missing so much. Especially the group thing mentioned above and draggable inserts!
|
|
Mar-10-2009 14:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:46.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|