Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Music Discussion > Making dance music in 1994
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
MrJiveBoJingles
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2004
Location: U.S.
Making dance music in 1994

Neat video showing some famous names hanging out in their studios and making beats back in 1994. This is back when a 66 MHz computer went for around $5000, and people used floppy disks to load songs. Cool gear collections of course, and the clothes are classic as well:



Old Post Jun-14-2009 21:41  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MrJiveBoJingles Click here to Send MrJiveBoJingles a Private Message Add MrJiveBoJingles to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
woscar
Starstuff



Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Guatemala, Guatemala

Cool vid but the tracks are kinda crap except for the last one


___________________

My Set Archive - MY BLOG

Old Post Jun-14-2009 21:48 
Click Here to See the Profile for woscar Click here to Send woscar a Private Message Visit woscar's homepage! Add woscar to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
bas
Stronger Lover



Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Here I Am Baby

The amount of work that went into creating something so simple is mind blowing. I can't believe how far everything has come.


___________________

Old Post Jun-14-2009 22:23  Egypt
Click Here to See the Profile for bas Click here to Send bas a Private Message Visit bas's homepage! Add bas to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Domesticated
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by bas
The amount of work that went into creating something so simple is mind blowing. I can't believe how far everything has come.


This is why I think music was better back then.

As a producer, you had to listen to a song literally thousands of times before the finished product was done. This ensured it had longevity. These days, you only have to re-listen to your track fifty or a hundred times before it's finished, and it can be sloppier as a result.

Old Post Jun-14-2009 23:34 
Click Here to See the Profile for Domesticated Click here to Send Domesticated a Private Message Add Domesticated to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
woscar
Starstuff



Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Guatemala, Guatemala

quote:
Originally posted by Domesticated
This is why I think music was better back then.

As a producer, you had to listen to a song literally thousands of times before the finished product was done. This ensured it had longevity. These days, you only have to re-listen to your track fifty or a hundred times before it's finished, and it can be sloppier as a result.




That makes no sense at all.


___________________

My Set Archive - MY BLOG

Old Post Jun-15-2009 00:22 
Click Here to See the Profile for woscar Click here to Send woscar a Private Message Visit woscar's homepage! Add woscar to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
gax
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Aug 2005
Location: OC

quote:
Originally posted by woscar


That makes no sense at all.

how does this make no sense at all? Think about it. Back in those days people had more heart and patience to make tracks. Now everyone wants to smash out songs as fast as possible, therefore as a result tracks are poorly produced and lack originality. Also, the more you listen to your track its more than likely you will get different ideas, be able to master and mix it as best as possible, and achieve that perfect sound you are looking for. Just my .02 cents.


___________________
If your not wasted, then the day is.
House Music is a feeling. Can you feel it?

Old Post Jun-15-2009 15:17  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for gax Click here to Send gax a Private Message Visit gax's homepage! Add gax to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ted Promo
NWO WOLFPACK INSANE



Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Can this be my goal??!

This whole nostalgia "better back in the day" argument gets stale especially when it's applied like a blanket around electronic music.

There is still TONS of good music being made. There's even more shit music being made out there as well. The only difference really seems that it's become much more easy and accessible. And all that means is that you had to rummage about a bit.

Yes, there are people who listen to tracks thousands of times over and there are people who slap it all together just to get it signed, forced onto the radio or into sets, and onto sites to cut checks or get exposure, but this isn't something that is just starting now with the onset of technology. It's been there all along, it's just now there's lots more people doing it in an era where everything is far more on display than it ever was before.

Old Post Jun-15-2009 16:43 
Click Here to See the Profile for Ted Promo Click here to Send Ted Promo a Private Message Add Ted Promo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
KiNeTiC ENeRgY
t3cHn0_43ad



Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Boca Raton

quote:
Originally posted by woscar


That makes no sense at all.


yea this really makes no sense.

Old Post Jun-15-2009 16:46  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for KiNeTiC ENeRgY Click here to Send KiNeTiC ENeRgY a Private Message Add KiNeTiC ENeRgY to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Trance-M
Since 1994 tranceaddict



Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Limburg, Netherlands

I remember my friend Lisaya playing with this a long time ago (Amiga and Protracker):


___________________

Longest (classic) Trance playlist on YouTube (5000 tracks released up to and including 1997), click here

Old Post Jun-15-2009 20:38  Netherlands
Click Here to See the Profile for Trance-M Click here to Send Trance-M a Private Message Add Trance-M to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Domesticated
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar


That makes no sense at all.


Why?

When you had a hardware sequencer, it was a painstaking process to put together a track. You had to listen to each individual element over and over and over, and then again and again and again as you combined them all together. This meant that if a part of the track initially sounded good but got old after a few listens, you'd pick up on it.

These days, you don't have to listen to the track as much when you're making it. Elements might sound good when you're producing, but then they could later get old. Newer producers don't pick up on this as much because they spend less time on each track. Thus some newer tracks have less longevity.

Old Post Jun-15-2009 23:23 
Click Here to See the Profile for Domesticated Click here to Send Domesticated a Private Message Add Domesticated to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
notelfreak
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2009
Location: not in elfreaks house at fucking all.

i don`t think you are totally right either.

a blanket statement saying that absolutely no one puts the same effort into tracks as in the past is false.

yes it is more accessible (production) leading to much more crap being churned out, i will give you that. As mentioned before though, if you dig the quality can be found. Digging is nothing new you know, i remember when i started, to preview the tracks you had to get the guy behind the counter to put the record on for you. There was still tons of shit being released back in the day, the only difference being that without being able to preview from the comfort of your home at the click of a button you did not have the time to notice it as much.

it is also false to assume that every single producer is purely a software guy that just lumps a bunch of presets together like he liked cheese and dated minnie.


___________________
ania will you marry me?

Old Post Jun-15-2009 23:29  Antigua and Barbuda
Click Here to See the Profile for notelfreak Click here to Send notelfreak a Private Message Add notelfreak to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
nefardec
Tranceaddict in tranning



Registered: Oct 2004
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by Domesticated
This is why I think music was better back then.

As a producer, you had to listen to a song literally thousands of times before the finished product was done. This ensured it had longevity. These days, you only have to re-listen to your track fifty or a hundred times before it's finished, and it can be sloppier as a result.


i kind of agree with you but just for the sake of being a dick, i'm going to say that the only difference is that back then people spent a lot more time and money to make something equally shitty.

Old Post Jun-15-2009 23:44 
Click Here to See the Profile for nefardec Click here to Send nefardec a Private Message Add nefardec to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Music Discussion > Making dance music in 1994
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (2): [1] 2 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackOld prog track No 2 to ID [2005] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackSilverblue - "Do You Know" [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 22:01.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!