Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Obama the African Colonial
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
The17sss
C.R.E.A.M.



Registered: May 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Obama the African Colonial

Very, very interesting read from the American Thinker by a 1st generation American woman who's family is from Nigeria, and who has spent almost equal time between Africa and the U.S., entrenched in both cultures. Her name is L.E. Ikenga.

quote:
Had Americans been able to stop obsessing over the color of Barack Obama's skin and instead paid more attention to his cultural identity, maybe he would not be in the White House today. The key to understanding him lies with his identification with his father, and his adoption of a cultural and political mindset rooted in postcolonial Africa.

Like many educated intellectuals in postcolonial Africa, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was enraged at the transformation of his native land by its colonial conqueror. But instead of embracing the traditional values of his own tribal cultural past, he embraced an imported Western ideology, Marxism. I call such frustrated and angry modern Africans who embrace various foreign "isms", instead of looking homeward for repair of societies that are broken, African Colonials. They are Africans who serve foreign ideas.

The tropes of America's racial history as a way of understanding all things black are useless in understanding the man who got his dreams from his father, a Kenyan exemplar of the African Colonial.

Before I continue, I need to say this: I am a first generation born West African-American woman whose parents emigrated to the U.S. in the 1970's from the country now called Nigeria. I travel to Nigeria frequently. I see myself as both a proud American and as a proud Igbo (the tribe that we come from -- also sometimes spelled Ibo). Politically, I have always been conservative (though it took this past election for me to commit to this once and for all!); my conservative values come from my Igbo heritage and my place of birth. Of course, none of this qualifies me to say what I am about to -- but at the same time it does.

My friends, despite what CNN and the rest are telling you, Barack Obama is nothing more than an old school African Colonial who is on his way to turning this country into one of the developing nations that you learn about on the National Geographic Channel.


Depleating the private sector of its resources and capital, and massive spending that we can't afford will inevitably lead down that path. Contunued....

quote:
Many conservative (East, West, South, North) African-Americans like myself -- those of us who know our history -- have seen this movie before. Here are two main reasons why many Americans allowed Obama to slip through the cracks despite all of his glaring inconsistencies:

First, Obama has been living on American soil for most of his adult life. Therefore, he has been able to masquerade as one who understands and believes in American democratic ideals. But he does not. Barack Obama is intrinsically undemocratic and as his presidency plays out, this will become more obvious.


... as we've already seen in the appointment of all these czars that have no accountability to legislative forces... who are not approved by Congress like cabinet secretaries are.

quote:
Second, and most importantly, too many Americans know very little about Africa. The one-size-fits-all understanding that many Americans (both black and white) continue to have of Africa might end up bringing dire consequences for this country.

Contrary to the way it continues to be portrayed in mainstream Western culture, Africa is not a continent that can be solely defined by AIDS, ethnic rivalries, poverty and safaris. Africa, like any other continent, has an immense history defined by much diversity and complexity. Africa's long-standing relationship with Europe speaks especially to some of these complexities -- particularly the relationship that has existed between the two continents over the past two centuries. Europe's complete colonization of Africa during the nineteenth century, also known as the Scramble for Africa, produced many unfortunate consequences, the African colonial being one of them.

The African colonial (AC) is a person who by means of their birth or lineage has a direct connection with Africa. However, unlike Africans like me, their worldviews have been largely shaped not by the indigenous beliefs of a specific African tribe but by the ideals of the European imperialism that overwhelmed and dominated Africa during the colonial period. AC's have no real regard for their specific African traditions or histories. AC's use aspects of their African culture as one would use pieces of costume jewelry: things of little or no value that can be thoughtlessly discarded when they become a negative distraction, or used on a whim to decorate oneself in order to seem exotic. (Hint: Obama's Muslim heritage).

On the other hand, AC's strive to be the best at the culture that they inherited from Europe. Throughout the West, they are tops in their professions as lawyers, doctors, engineers, Ivy League professors and business moguls; this is all well and good. It's when they decide to engage us as politicians that things become messy and convoluted.

The African colonial politician (ACP) feigns repulsion towards the hegemonic paradigms of Western civilization. But at the same time, he is completely enamored of the trappings of its aristocracy or elite culture. The ACP blames and caricatures whitey to no end for all that has gone wrong in the world. He convinces the masses that various forms of African socialism are the best way for redressing the problems that European colonialism motivated in Africa. However, as opposed to really being a hard-core African Leftist who actually believes in something, the ACP uses socialist themes as a way to disguise his true ambitions: a complete power grab whereby the "will of the people" becomes completely irrelevant.

Barack Obama is all of the above. The only difference is that he is here playing (colonial) African politics as usual.

In his 1995 memoir, Dreams From My Father -- an eloquent piece of political propaganda -- Obama styles himself as a misunderstood intellectual who is deeply affected by the sufferings of black people, especially in America and Africa. In the book, Obama clearly sees himself as an African, not as a black American. And to prove this, he goes on a quest to understand his Kenyan roots. He is extremely thoughtful of his deceased father's legacy; this provides the main clue for understanding Barack Obama.

Barack Obama Sr. was an African colonial to the core; in his case, the apple did not fall far from the tree. All of the telltale signs of Obama's African colonialist attitudes are on full display in the book -- from his feigned antipathy towards Europeans to his view of African tribal associations as distracting elements that get in the way of "progress". (On p. 308 of Dreams From My Father, Obama says that African tribes should be viewed as an "ancient loyalties".)

Like imperialists of Old World Europe, the ACP sees their constituents not as free thinking individuals who best know how to go about achieving and creating their own means for success. Instead, the ACP sees his constituents as a flock of ignorant sheep that need to be led -- oftentimes to their own slaughter.

Like the European imperialist who spawned him, the ACP is a destroyer of all forms of democracy.

Here are a few examples of what the British did in order to create (in 1914) what is now called Nigeria and what Obama is doing to you:

1) Convince the people that "clinging" to any aspect of their cultural (tribal) identity or history is bad and regresses the process of "unity". British Imperialists deeply feared people who were loyal to anything other than the state. "Tribalism" made the imperialists have to work harder to get people to just fall in line. Imperialists pitted tribes against each other in order to create chaos that they then blamed on ethnic rivalry. Today many "educated" Nigerians, having believed that their traditions were irrelevant, remain completely ignorant of their ancestry and the history of their own tribes.

2) Confiscate the wealth and resources of the area that you govern by any means necessary in order to redistribute wealth. The British used this tactic to present themselves as empathetic and benevolent leaders who wanted everyone to have a "fair shake". Imperialists are not interested in equality for all. They are interested in controlling all.

3) Convince the masses that your upper-crust university education naturally puts you on an intellectual plane from which to understand everything even when you understand nothing. Imperialists were able to convince the people that their elite university educations allowed them to understand what Africa needed. Many of today's Nigerians-having followed that lead-hold all sorts of degrees and certificates-but what good are they if you can't find a job?

4) Lie to the people and tell them that progress is being made even though things are clearly becoming worse. One thing that the British forgot to mention to their Nigerian constituents was that one day, the resources that were being used to engineer "progress" (which the British had confiscated from the Africans to begin with!) would eventually run out. After WWII, Western Europe could no longer afford to hold on to their African colonies. So all of the counterfeit countries that the Europeans created were then left high-and-dry to fend for themselves. This was the main reason behind the African independence movements of the 1950 and 60's. What will a post-Obama America look like?

5) Use every available media outlet to perpetuate the belief that you and your followers are the enlightened ones-and that those who refuse to support you are just barbaric, uncivilized, ignorant curmudgeons. This speaks for itself.

America, don't be fooled. The Igbos were once made up of a confederacy of clans that ascribed to various forms of democratic government. They took their eyes off the ball and before they knew it, the British were upon them. Also, understand this: the African colonial who is given too much political power can only become one thing: a despot.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009...n_colonial.html

I think she's right... because what's happening now I don't believe most Americans expected or wanted. You all know how horribly uninformed most of the public is, and a good bet is that for many people, it's all about seeing a black man as president, and being able to say, "Oh we're shedding some of our guilt here. Look at how enlightened we are, what a great country we are," when in fact we've elected somebody who's policies are seeing less and less public support while his personal popularity is still sky high. You can see what the author is talking about in regards to his healthcare legislation, the stimulus bill, taking over automobile companies, the czars that are not accountable to anybody but him, and now the climate bill.

Last edited by The17sss on Jun-29-2009 at 05:58

Old Post Jun-29-2009 05:47  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for The17sss Click here to Send The17sss a Private Message Add The17sss to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
CHRles
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Nashville

Biggest pile of horseshit I've read all month.
The only ones being fooled into thinking she's right are the people who want to believe more than anything that Obama is bad, ie hardcore conservatives.

Old Post Jun-29-2009 12:07  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for CHRles Click here to Send CHRles a Private Message Add CHRles to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Lebezniatnikov
Stupidity Annoys Me



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: DC

As a first-generation Igbo, her parents were probably refugees from the Biafran War, and as such I can certainly understand her anti-British sentiments. But to somehow infer that putting stock in philosophies outside one's own culture is a form of intellectual colonialism seems awfully radical. I mean, I don't have much German in me, but I still read Kant. Where does one draw the line?

As to the substance of her article, I don't know what demented sort of worldview it takes to believe that Obama is "turning America into a developing country." Her historical linearity is pretty off - "redistribution" seems to be a code-word for patrimonial rent-seeking behavior, and we have very little of that in the United States (that goes un-prosecuted at least). A strong government with linkages to the people in terms of taxes received and services bestowed is non-existent in the African experience, so I don't know how she makes the giant leap from one sort of perceived "redistribution" to the other. I started a thread on this about two months back.

Point three seems to be a rather anti-establishment take on education. Because Obama encourages people to go to college and get degrees, that makes him somehow an imperialist? I don't get the logic here - it's the same type of nonsense employed by culorut and the like.

Point four suggests that she doesn't pay attention to what's going on - I think Obama has been remarkably frank about the challenges that we face and will continue to face well into the future. I can only assume that your standard defense of this point is going to be the "jobs saved" figure, which varies depending on methodology employed (as do most such "soft" statistics).

And point five, really? We're back on the liberal-media-as-tool-of-Democrats conspiracy?

This seems to me an op-ed short on fact, historical or current, and very long on unsubstantiated opinion.


___________________

Old Post Jun-29-2009 12:26  United Nations
Click Here to See the Profile for Lebezniatnikov Click here to Send Lebezniatnikov a Private Message Add Lebezniatnikov to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
HardTranceProd
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Washington DC

If I could meet the author of this piece in person, I'd give her an excellent book by James C. Bennett called "Anglosphere: Why English-Speaking Nations Will Lead The Way" (and have always led the way, actually).
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_g...phere&x=13&y=21

Railing against the Anglo-Saxon culture, and those who espouse it regardless of their ethnic background, is useless, and really a waste of time. America and its Anglo cousins around the world (Canada, the UK, and Australia) are the most prosperous nations on earth for a reason.

Note that this is not racist comment. The Anglo-Saxon culture is defined not only by its genes, but also by its memes, a term which denotes ideas and beliefs. In America, we have people with names like Chang, Gonzalez, and Obama, who are obviously not genetically Anglo-Saxon, but who are memetically Anglo--they agree with the Anglo values of democracy, separation of powers, due process, fair play, enterpreneurship, diversity, and others that the Anglo civilization has given the world. Obama is one of them.

There's a term called "self-loathing." When you see people around the world burning American flags or railing against the West, of course they may have some legitimate anger about colonial humiliation, but at the same time they acknowledge with grudging respect the supremacy of the Anglosphere's values and principles, and are actually angry at themselves. Witness the events in Iran.

I actually find it hard to understand how this woman could be American-born, given her intrinsically anti-Western views. In my experience, people of all races and ethnicities who were born in this country accept and embrace the broad Anglo/Western ideas upon which America is based.

quote:

Like imperialists of Old World Europe, the ACP sees their constituents not as free thinking individuals who best know how to go about achieving and creating their own means for success. Instead, the ACP sees his constituents as a flock of ignorant sheep that need to be led -- oftentimes to their own slaughter.


As a brutally honest and objective person who values the truth above any particular political dogma, I will go ahead and risk incurring the wrath of PC crowd by saying that the African continent is much worse off now, economically, than it was when the colonialists were present, based on some of the facts I've read about modern Africa. This is just an impartial observation, not judgmental in the least. I'm merely observing that the author's "free thinking" compatriots who "best know how to go about achieving and creating" have not exactly brought the "success" that she refers to, in terms of her country/continent.


___________________
"The favorite American pastime is not baseball, it's moral crusades."

Last edited by HardTranceProd on Jun-29-2009 at 15:47

Old Post Jun-29-2009 15:16  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for HardTranceProd Click here to Send HardTranceProd a Private Message Add HardTranceProd to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Lilith
Meowsies!



Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Maximum Security twilight home for cats

This "L.E. Ikenga" suddenly pops out of the internet and starts spouting this kind of rhetoric sound legit?
quote:
Contributors are accomplished in fields beyond journalism, and animated to write for the general public out of concern for the complex and morally significant questions on the national agenda.

A brief look around, she's never had much else published as far as I can tell, I'd definitely take it with a grain of salt than any kind of face value.

Old Post Jun-30-2009 07:15 
Click Here to See the Profile for Lilith Click here to Send Lilith a Private Message Add Lilith to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion



Registered: Jul 2002
Location:

quote:

But instead of embracing the traditional values of his own tribal cultural past, he embraced an imported Western ideology, Marxism. I call such frustrated and angry modern Africans who embrace various foreign "isms", instead of looking homeward for repair of societies that are broken, African Colonials. They are Africans who serve foreign ideas.


i tried to, but i really couldn't concentrate on her after that.


___________________

Old Post Jun-30-2009 07:27  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for pkcRAISTLIN Click here to Send pkcRAISTLIN a Private Message Add pkcRAISTLIN to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Obama the African Colonial
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

 
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackAcid Trance/House track - House Party Channel 4 [2012] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackJoh Tejada - "Chorgs" [2005]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:51.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!