 |
|
|
|
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
Why not just look for a used/in-good-condition 1200 in your area? You should be able to pick one up very cheap with lots of people jumping ship to all digital setups...
If you intend to DJ with the tracks you are going to digitize, it's important you use a quality turntable... sound quality is important of course (you'll want a decent cartridge), the other is wow and flutter.
If you digitize the tracks using a crappy belt drive, any wow and flutter will be transferred to the digital recording and make the tracks a pain to mix.
|
|
Dec-18-2007 15:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
That expensive? They are really about half the cost of a new one around here. And you CAN use the carts they come with, if they happen to be quality. Remember, for the really good carts (Ortofon, Shure Whitelabels, etc), you can replace the stylus for not much money, which essentially gives you a new cartridge.
I would work on spinning vinyl before you sell your CDJ's... it's quite and adjustment going from CD's to Vinyl (but not the other way around).
| quote: | Originally posted by skip
yeah, i intend to dj with the tracks, so indeed i would probably have to get a proper TT anyway. and used techs are so damn expensive. you're not gonna find one for under 400€ here anywhere (at least it seems so) and then i'd buy new needles anyway just to get the best quality so the needles coming with the tech would be pretty much worthless to me, but i could save some money if they came with a dustcover. so if it's just 100 to 150€ i could save buying a used tech i don't think it's really worth it.
i've also thought about selling my cdjs and getting 2 techs and traktor scratch (which i'm going to get anyway after i buy a laptop), but i'm somewhat unsure if that's wise as i've never spun vinyl and i'm thinking cdjs might be more accurate. so i really dunno what to do now! 
edit: also i'd be buying a 1210, i don't like the silver ones at all. |
|
|
Dec-18-2007 15:51
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
Since the pitch slider on a 1200 is analog (except for the M5G), there aren't any real "increments" per-se.
You need to learn to ride the pitch with a 1200, as it's nearly impossible to lock two tracks together as tightly as you can with a CDJ (with .02% increments).
| quote: | Originally posted by skip
i looked around a bit and finding a tech for under 400€/piece is not that easy. and i'd like to get a mk5 too, because i would like not to have the click at 0dB. i guess i'll just have to wait until i have more money and then see what i'll do.
and i know playing with TTs will be more difficult than with cdjs at first, but i'm not worried about that. i'm more worried about the wow and flutter and accuracy compared to cdjs with 0,02% accuracy (as IMO 0,1% on cdjs is not accurate enough at all). |
|
|
Dec-18-2007 18:33
|
|
|
 |
 |
skip
a.k.a. skip2

Registered: Sep 2002
Location: home or somewhere else
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Ryan0751
Since the pitch slider on a 1200 is analog (except for the M5G), there aren't any real "increments" per-se.
You need to learn to ride the pitch with a 1200, as it's nearly impossible to lock two tracks together as tightly as you can with a CDJ (with .02% increments). |
yeah, i know that the pitch slider is analog and because of that it doesn't have increments, but what i'm concerned about is getting the tunes matched as good as possible, nothing else. and i dunno how much the wow & flutter really affect on TTs as i've never played on any. but some people say that it's easier to get tunes matched "exactly" on TTs and some say it's easier on CDJs with 0,02% resolution, i dunno which is more true as i've only played on CDJs with 0,1% resolution.
this is getting very offtopic now though, but who cares as we're the only two participating.
have you played on the m5g's? are they any different because of the digital pitch slider? i'd expect them to have the same wow & flutter though. or am i completely mistaken? i'd think they are because of the motor, not because of the pitch being analog. i just checked some prices and a m5g would cost me 56€ more than a mk5 if i want a dustcover, so if i decide to buy a new one i might as well get a m5g then. 
___________________

Get Dropbox, with 250 MB extra space!
|
|
Dec-18-2007 18:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
Never touched M5G's.
Wow and flutter is negligible on 1200's. There are a lot of other factors which make it harder to mix. Most everyone I know who plays on both well says vinyl is much more difficult, and I agree.
The pitch slider of a 1200 is the same length as a CDJ-1000, and yet while the CDJ covers only a +/- 6% range, a 1200 covers +/- 8%. So the same little adjusment on a 1200 will make a bigger pitch change than on the CDJ.
The real issue is in correcting a mix. While you can very easily flick the plater on a CDJ and get a predicitable result, generally touching the record (or pushing it) on a 1200 can easily result in an overcorrection.
This is why most people graduate to riding the pitch... requires you to really stay on top of the mix, listening the whole time in your phones, and making tiny (millimeters) adjustments up and down to keep the beats locked.
Warped records, strange pressings, etc all add a little as well. And don't forget physics... a record will spin a LITTLE bit faster as the tone arm gets closer to the center (less drag).
It comes with practice of course. Just don't expect it to be like CDJ's where you can get something perfectly beatmatched ahead of time and expect it to stay there.
| quote: | Originally posted by skip
yeah, i know that the pitch slider is analog and because of that it doesn't have increments, but what i'm concerned about is getting the tunes matched as good as possible, nothing else. and i dunno how much the wow & flutter really affect on TTs as i've never played on any. but some people say that it's easier to get tunes matched "exactly" on TTs and some say it's easier on CDJs with 0,02% resolution, i dunno which is more true as i've only played on CDJs with 0,1% resolution.
this is getting very offtopic now though, but who cares as we're the only two participating.
have you played on the m5g's? are they any different because of the digital pitch slider? i'd expect them to have the same wow & flutter though. or am i completely mistaken? i'd think they are because of the motor, not because of the pitch being analog. i just checked some prices and a m5g would cost me 56€ more than a mk5 if i want a dustcover, so if i decide to buy a new one i might as well get a m5g then. |
|
|
Dec-18-2007 19:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:44.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|