Originally posted by chinamon
not true. i say "ugh"
but i am a tranny.
quote:
Originally posted by kotsy
lol colour me retarded
Aug-09-2008 15:10
loca
the vibe raider
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Oz
Much as I thought Blur was great, I was always a much bigger fan of Oasis.
___________________
Whatever it may take I keep on trying.
Aug-09-2008 15:12
nadezhda
Sophisticated Lady
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: shoegazing
i think blur are 10x better. oasis put out one good album (definitely maybe) and then everything after that sounded exactly the same. even noel himself said that their third album was shit cos they were doing too many drugs. blur kept reinventing themselves from shoegaze to brit pop to lo-fi. their music is a lot more interesting.
re: the verve:
the verve pre-Urban Hymns are the greatest band ever, but they weren't brit pop. Urban Hymns was basically an ashcroft solo album and a pop record. yes, their most popular, but the weakest cos nick mccabe took a backseat to the songwriting process. listen to anything put out before then and they sounded completely different and much more interesting. at least their new album hearkens back to a bit of the early verve, and isn't urban hymns part 2.
___________________
no my first name ain't baby. it's janet. miss jackson if you're nasty.
Last edited by nadezhda on Aug-09-2008 at 19:28
Aug-09-2008 15:14
LKD
Omni-peasant
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Its June 18th, 2005, I'm at the Skybar
I prefer The Smiths or Gene to either Blur or Oasis.
___________________
Nathan Fake - Outhouse (Valentino Kanzyani Remix) || ID PLZ!PVD ID!!!
Disco and classical had sex while watching a sci-fi movie. Their child: trance.