 |
|
|
|
 |
atbell
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: May 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
|
Which assets are being sold?
People will always make money if they invest in a good or service which they can sell for more than they invested, the question is what people will want in 5 years, 10 years?
California also sold off some assets recently, nothing exciting but just things like cop cars. I bet the people that bought them aren't doing much better.
...
oh, the LCBO, that's a big one. McGinty would be nuts to sell it. A government controled monopoly on an addictive substance? Cash cow. Selling drinks has been profitable for centuries and it resists recessions to the point of retaining value in a full on economic collapse (as per Russia).
If you don't mind selling booze to drunks who are ruining thier lives LCBO spells opertunity.
From a consumer point of view, Quebec and BC definately have interesting varients which are good and bad. Here (Quebec) I can get a 12, 24 or a bottle of wine with my groceries. Makes me spend a bit more on drinks but seems to be less conducive to binge drinking. A bottle of wine or two over the week instead of a 26er on the weekend type of idea. Hard booze is still controled but wine and beer can be sold anywhere, even the corner store, like smokes.
BC has some odd laws about buying from a bar and taking it home.
|
|
Dec-21-2009 15:09
|
|
|
 |
 |
Moral Hazard
Oppressing the 99%

Registered: Mar 2005
Location: with the 1%
|
|
|
Meh, the concern that Ontario would loose a boat-load of chash by selling the LCBO is folly. The vast majority of the LCBO's revenue comes from excise taxes on alcohol, which are erroniously recorded as revenue for the LCBO rather then tax. These taxes are mandated by legislation and would be in place regardless of who was selling the liquor (which is why buying a bottle of wine at a winery costs just about as much as the same bottle through the LCBO). If the province were to sell the LCBO they would retain that revenue and off-load the operating expenses. The only loss to the province would be the operating profit, which is minimal to non-existant. The last year I could find data for was 2002-2003 (LCBO does not publish annual reports) claimed $939 million on sales of $3.1 billion; however, after paying $975-million taxes (income and excise), the LCBO lost $35 million. I'm not saying that it loses money every year but the claims of billon dollar profits are an accounting trick rather then reality and have nothing to do with the LCBO retail operations.
All the above stated, I think that selling any crown assets at this time is a bad idea. The market is terribly de-valued right now and the only players with enough cash to buy the LCBO or OLG are private equity companies or pension funds. Both of these types of investors have taken a beating over the past yearish and would only be willing to make acquisitions of this ilk if they were picking it up at a bargin. So, if we were to sell these assets now we can pretty much count on getting well below what the market value would be in a couple of years. Selling crown assets in a bad market, especially for the purpose of financing debt, is bad policy.
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by RickyM
you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about. |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down 
|
|
|
Dec-22-2009 12:58
|
|
|
 |
 |
ak87
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: GTA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
All the above stated, I think that selling any crown assets at this time is a bad idea. The market is terribly de-valued right now and the only players with enough cash to buy the LCBO or OLG are private equity companies or pension funds. Both of these types of investors have taken a beating over the past yearish and would only be willing to make acquisitions of this ilk if they were picking it up at a bargin. So, if we were to sell these assets now we can pretty much count on getting well below what the market value would be in a couple of years. Selling crown assets in a bad market, especially for the purpose of financing debt, is bad policy. |
So if it comes close to sale, and the government sells it off, we need to pick which pension fund is buyin it
|
|
Dec-23-2009 03:31
|
|
|
 |
 |
Audbrey76
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
|
|
|
Cool. The canadian dollar was above the american dollar but it went back under. Canada is not always the favorite neighbor to me I like mexico!
___________________
http://whitehouse.gov
|
|
Dec-28-2009 05:13
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:33.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|