|
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
Def why I'd like to see this pan out again from a strictly military technology point of view. The first one was the only real major use of modern weapons technologies on both sides of the war, especially naval weapons, during the cold war.
How far we have come in 30 some years would be interesting, especially as for the fact that the last 10 years the UK has been moving away from the capacity to fight large scale conflicts. |
Except the UK don't really need to fight a large scale conflict to secure their interests in this case. A simple naval operation to block Argentine shipping while protecting British friendly shipping, sea to shore missile attacks on air bases and SAS raids on strategic points would do the trick nicely. No matter how this pans out it will not turn into a large scale conflict because all the UK needs to do in order to acheive their goals is to defend the shipping lanes and deflect any anphibious landing (if Argentina were crazy enough to ever try), which the Royal Navy is perfectly designed for - in fact, that is their primary raison d'etre.
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by RickyM
you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about. |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down 
|
|