Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > DJ set EQ
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
ACK5
tranceaddict



Registered: Jan 2010
Location: London
DJ set EQ

Hi Guys


Want to know if any of you do any mastering after you recorded a set. Even though I make sure that I record my set with a decent signal going into Logic I find that the volume is a bit weak after I burned it to a CD.
Does anyone have any tips on how to warm up the sound?

Thanks


___________________
http://soundcloud.com/ack5

Old Post May-06-2010 11:06  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for ACK5 Click here to Send ACK5 a Private Message Visit ACK5's homepage! Add ACK5 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Zak McKracken
Trance



Registered: Jun 2003
Location:

sidechain, analog.


no just add a little compression and raise the gain a littlebit.

Old Post May-06-2010 18:45 
Click Here to See the Profile for Zak McKracken Click here to Send Zak McKracken a Private Message Add Zak McKracken to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Max Thomson
synthetic kinda love



Registered: May 2004
Location: Berkeley, California

Your tracks are already mastered, don't try to master them again. Doing so will almost always yield disastrous results: what you think is a good change at the time will sound unnatural and/or fatiguing on other playback systems. Instead use a high quality, professional sound card and dj mixer. Make sure your soundcard input is all the way up. Watch your levels very carefully and leave around 10 dB of headroom so you don't clip. Having the peaks around -6 dB or even -10 dB below 0 is fine, in fact its preferred so you have some headroom to work with later. Most RCA record outputs on dj mixers output at -10 dB, meaning the record level output is 10 dB below the clipping point of the mixer (the red light at the top). Once you're done recording, increase the overall level with the gain to as close to 0 dB as you can without clipping. MAKE SURE you don't clip (you'll be able to see if you are by looking closely at the waveform). Convert the file from 24bit to 16bit but be sure to dither before you do. This allows for a higher noise floor = ability to raise the volume with less distortion.

Optional: if you're still not happy with how loud it is, apply a limiter to the mix with a couple extra dBs of input gain. This will increase the overall volume of the mix without clipping, as it automatically reduces the gain before the clipping occurs. Set the output to -0.3 dB just to be on the safe side, some limiters are less effective than others. I never push a limiter more than 2-4 dB, doing so will alter your transitions by making the mix less dynamic (less of a difference between soft and loud parts).

Convert the 16 bit WAV to mp3 with your preferred mp3 encoder, mine is Max (for Mac). I think encoding at less than 320 this days is foolish, but that's up to you.

Bam, you're done.

Oh, and forget about your mastering plugins, they're useless on already mastered tracks. Holler if you have any questions.


___________________
-> mixes & more @ maxwelldub.net : .
-> professional analog mastering @ deliverance-mastering.com : .


"A studio environment is there to be exploited. I don't really hold with these 'all live on 2 decks mixes'. If you want that, go to the gig." - Ben Watt

Last edited by Max Thomson on May-08-2010 at 02:38

Old Post May-08-2010 02:26  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Max Thomson Click here to Send Max Thomson a Private Message Visit Max Thomson's homepage! Add Max Thomson to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
orTofønChiLd
Everything is illuminated



Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Miami

all it needs is analogue boost

Old Post May-08-2010 02:29 
Click Here to See the Profile for orTofønChiLd Click here to Send orTofønChiLd a Private Message Visit orTofønChiLd's homepage! Add orTofønChiLd to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Brandt Slater
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2010
Location: Long Beach, California USA

All my mixes get recorded to an Alesis Masterlink. Only thing I do afterwards is normalize or level boost. Maybe a little compression to keep the levels in check. Especially during transitions. But that's it. The tracks are already mastered.

On the Masterlink, I set the record levels to -6db. The signal comes out of the mixer digital and inputs digital. -6 for a Masterlink is a good starting point. Sometimes during transitions I'll see a spike peak at around -2. But that's ok. The onboard compression and limiting can take care of that. I'll boost the signal during mixdown as close to 0db as possible. If not that's ok too. It's digital. All real digital mixing consoles are referenced at -18db as their analog 0db unity. So boosting in the digital domain isn't as important as it is in the analog world.

Last edited by Brandt Slater on May-08-2010 at 05:50

Old Post May-08-2010 05:34 
Click Here to See the Profile for Brandt Slater Click here to Send Brandt Slater a Private Message Add Brandt Slater to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ACK5
tranceaddict



Registered: Jan 2010
Location: London

Thanks for the reply guys will play around with this over the wekend.


___________________
http://soundcloud.com/ack5

Old Post May-08-2010 07:06  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for ACK5 Click here to Send ACK5 a Private Message Visit ACK5's homepage! Add ACK5 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
djkopernikus
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2006
Location: Lempaeaelae

Just try to keep it as balanced as possible. You gain nothing by "boosting" your mix. Listener can boost volume itself by volume button, and that is better when the sound is clear and not a porridge.


___________________
mattiollikainen.blogspot.com

Old Post May-08-2010 09:07  Finland
Click Here to See the Profile for djkopernikus Click here to Send djkopernikus a Private Message Add djkopernikus to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Stu Cox
Supreme smackaddict



Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK

Yes, most of your tracks have already been mastered. Some haven't (there are some fucking sloppy digital labels and producers around), but there will never be a one-size-fits-all option which will work on every track in a mix.

If you think certain tracks need a bit of touching up it's best to do that on a track-by-track basis before you record your mix.

Analogue inputs on sound cards and recording apparatus in general are never perfectly linear though, so you'll find that if you record a track in and normalise your peaks to 0dB, it'll rarely be as loud as the original track. As has been already said, a limiter is often the best way of bringing the level up a bit without clipping, but go easy and use a commercially released track as a reference for volume.

At the end of the day, at the points in a mix when you're layering two tracks together, even with the EQ work in the world you'll usually find the overall level rising a bit. A gentle bit of compression (like that carefully used limiter) helps to keep things even, but it's not going to make up for slopping use of your gains and levels when you record the mix. It also helps things to sound more cohesive, as the overlapping tracks will have a bit of common 'motion'.


___________________
Stu Cox |

Old Post May-08-2010 10:41  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for Stu Cox Click here to Send Stu Cox a Private Message Visit Stu Cox's homepage! Add Stu Cox to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ACK5
tranceaddict



Registered: Jan 2010
Location: London

Thanks for all the input. I did some tests and found that using just a limiter on the master channel works quite well. I tried using a compressor but it does not always sound good on all the tracks.

Do any of you guys have experience using this software platinumnotes


___________________
http://soundcloud.com/ack5

Old Post May-11-2010 14:12  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for ACK5 Click here to Send ACK5 a Private Message Visit ACK5's homepage! Add ACK5 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Max Thomson
synthetic kinda love



Registered: May 2004
Location: Berkeley, California

dont use platinum notes. it tries to remaster your already mastered tracks and slap ozone multiband compressors on them, which is not a good idea. mixed in key on the other hand is a great product.

the main thing to take away from this topic is that less is more. use high quality equipment setup properly and you'll end up with the best sound, period.


___________________
-> mixes & more @ maxwelldub.net : .
-> professional analog mastering @ deliverance-mastering.com : .


"A studio environment is there to be exploited. I don't really hold with these 'all live on 2 decks mixes'. If you want that, go to the gig." - Ben Watt

Old Post May-11-2010 14:46  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Max Thomson Click here to Send Max Thomson a Private Message Visit Max Thomson's homepage! Add Max Thomson to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Rodri Santos
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Milan

no posproduction, ideally you should only use the gain knobs between the track to have a consistent volume, and i personally add 0.8 Db to the master channel but there is no "scientific" purpose of this , don't be afraid to set all the eqs of the upcoming track at the middle, some tracks have a powerful snare and if your last track has a low one it's going to sound bad, you can raise it progressively while the track it's playing.

But you should not:

-Try to master the tracks, the exception can be really old tracks.
-Modify the full 1 hour, 2 hour... because you are destroying the dinamics.

And mix in 320kbps mp3 or wav, this way the sound will be clean

Old Post May-11-2010 18:13  Spain
Click Here to See the Profile for Rodri Santos Click here to Send Rodri Santos a Private Message Add Rodri Santos to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Stu Cox
Supreme smackaddict



Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK

quote:
Originally posted by Rodri Santos
But you should not:

-Try to master the tracks, the exception can be really old tracks.

I'm afraid I disagree with this - nowadays the quality control, particularly on smaller labels, is so poor that a lot of otherwise really good tracks get through either with bad mastering or no mastering at all.

If a tune's going to sound better with a bit of remastering, then remaster it! I've done this with loads of new tracks I've bought in recent years, not just old tracks.


___________________
Stu Cox |

Old Post May-11-2010 18:18  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for Stu Cox Click here to Send Stu Cox a Private Message Visit Stu Cox's homepage! Add Stu Cox to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > DJ set EQ
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (2): [1] 2 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackAbsolutely stunning track from party! Please listen to it and help to recognize [2011] [2]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackVanessa Mae - "White Bird" (Cosmic Gate Remix) [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 17:48.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!